• Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad

Latest Reviews & Articles

Overclocking Core 2 Duo: Power Versus Performance

Overclocking Core 2 Duo: Power Versus Performance

Intel's fastest Core 2 Duo, the E8600, runs at 3.33 GHz. But if you're a performance-hungry power user, we found that you can actually increase the chip's efficiency by overclocking it, thanks to 45 nm manufacturing and plenty of built-in headroom. Read more

Life At 2 GT/s: 6 GB DDR3-2000 Memory Kits Compared

Life At 2 GT/s: 6 GB DDR3-2000 Memory Kits Compared

Memory vendors put a lot of effort into drumming up excitement over high-end memory kits, but many of those products turn out to be vaporware. We test six DDR3-2000 kits that enthusiasts can actually buy today, and push them as far as they'll go. Read more

DDR3 Memory Scaling On AMD's Phenom II X4

DDR3 Memory Scaling On AMD's Phenom II X4

DDR3 memory is available in speeds ranging from DDR3-800 to DDR3-2133. Which is the best memory choice for AMD’s Phenom II X4? We tested as many speeds as possible using aggressive and conservative timings to find the sweet spot for your next build. Read more

Intel Core i7-975 Extreme And i7-950 Reviewed

Intel Core i7-975 Extreme And i7-950 Reviewed

Today Intel launches two high-end processors that take the place of its i7-965 and i7-940 CPUs. More speed? Same price points? We’ll take it! But are the new chips compelling enough to warrant spending more than you would on an i7-920? Read more

All the Reviews & Articles
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > AT-822 or Nady CM-2S ?

AT-822 or Nady CM-2S ?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

I've used a (borrowed) Audio Technica AT-822 stereo mic for recording
acoustic jazz trio and quartet. I really like it. I was about to buy
one when I heard about the Nady CM-2S. It appears to be identical to
the AT-822 for much less.
Here's a link to the technical docs for both mics.

http://www.jazzdrummer.com/mics/at822.pdf

http://www.jazzdrummer.com/mics/CM2S.pdf

Though I gather that Nady and Audio Technica are not in the same
league, I would expect the Nady to sound very much like the Audio
Technica based on the identical specs, but I would love to know what
anyone else here thinks.

Thanks,


Keith Runfola
www.jazzdrummer.com

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

keith runfola <remove this> wrote:
>I've used a (borrowed) Audio Technica AT-822 stereo mic for recording
>acoustic jazz trio and quartet. I really like it. I was about to buy
>one when I heard about the Nady CM-2S. It appears to be identical to
>the AT-822 for much less.

It's not.

>Though I gather that Nady and Audio Technica are not in the same
>league, I would expect the Nady to sound very much like the Audio
>Technica based on the identical specs, but I would love to know what
>anyone else here thinks.

It doesn't. I'm not a great fan of the AT-822 to begin with. But if
you have listened to it and like it, buy it, stop worrying, and don't
look back.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On 29 Aug 2005 21:12:17 -0400, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

>keith runfola <remove this> wrote:
>>I've used a (borrowed) Audio Technica AT-822 stereo mic for recording
>>acoustic jazz trio and quartet. I really like it. I was about to buy
>>one when I heard about the Nady CM-2S. It appears to be identical to
>>the AT-822 for much less.
>
>It's not.
>
>>Though I gather that Nady and Audio Technica are not in the same
>>league, I would expect the Nady to sound very much like the Audio
>>Technica based on the identical specs, but I would love to know what
>>anyone else here thinks.
>
>It doesn't. I'm not a great fan of the AT-822 to begin with. But if
>you have listened to it and like it, buy it, stop worrying, and don't
>look back.
>--scott

Thanks Scott. I would love to hear what stereo mic you prefer and
exactly why you think the Nady CM-2S isn't as good as the AT-822.
I'm trying to learn something here. Thanks again,


Keith Runfola
www.jazzdrummer.com

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

keith runfola <remove this> wrote:
>
>Thanks Scott. I would love to hear what stereo mic you prefer and
>exactly why you think the Nady CM-2S isn't as good as the AT-822.
>I'm trying to learn something here. Thanks again,

I can't talk about what is inside the Nady for various reasons.

But for a very interesting test, try using any one of these stereo
mikes just as a mono mike, with one channel. Listen to a pair of
keys jingling through them. This will tell you a lot about the
ability of the mike to handle transients. Then listen to a voice,
and listen as the voice moves off to the side, keeping the same
distance. This tells you something about the off-axis response.

You'll find the difference between good and bad microphones centers
around these two factors. The Nady does something very interesting
on the key jingle test.

In that price range you don't have too many better choices than the
AT.... the Shure VP-88 sounds good but is kind of noisy. I'm not a
big fan of stereo mikes because they aren't very flexible, but if
you absolutely need a stereo mike rather than a pair of seperate
cardioids, it might be worth putting the money into the Sankens.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > AT-822 or Nady CM-2S ?
Go to:

There are 868 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread. Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links