Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > SP T3. Any real experiences?

SP T3. Any real experiences?

Forum Audio : Pro Audio - SP T3. Any real experiences?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

I'm looking for a condensor mic mainly for male pop and folk vocals. I
haven't read a lot about the T3 but a lot of the other mics from studio
projects get great reviews. I really need something with that nice
tube fuzz sound, but i don't want anything annoyingly bright on the
top. A mic that smooths out nasal sounds would be a nice bonus.

SP T3 good for this? Any other suggestions (in the sub $500 price
range).

Thanks in advance.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

<yoda_muppet@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I'm looking for a condensor mic mainly for male pop and folk vocals. I
>haven't read a lot about the T3 but a lot of the other mics from studio
>projects get great reviews. I really need something with that nice
>tube fuzz sound, but i don't want anything annoyingly bright on the
>top. A mic that smooths out nasal sounds would be a nice bonus.

Tube fuzz sound? Huh?

If you want to smooth out nasal voices, look at the Beyer M-500. It's
not a condenser mike and it doesn't have a tube in it, but it does the
job nicely.
--scott


--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"I really need something with that nice tube fuzz sound"

Have you ever used a tube mic? Have you ever compared a few tube mics? What
the hell is the "tube fuzz sound"?

A good tube mic's impedance converter won't sound fuzzy. If it does, you
have a problem.

JP

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Hi and thanks for the replys. By Fuzz, I guess maybe fizz or sizzle
would have been a better word. What I'm referring to is a nice
detailed sound around 4k, and a nice smooth but not boomy low end.

Thanks again.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

To JP:

Thanks for the reply. I have never used a tube mic, mostly my
experience is with inexpensive large condensors, small condensors, and
sm57s. Since I record a limited number or instruments these have
worked quite well for me. I'm currently looking for something to
polish the vocal sound. Suggestions are welcome.

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

I have a track posted on Soundclick in which I used a Studio Projects T3 for
the female vocal. I ran it through an original Joemeek VC1Q preamp, and
into a Digi002/Pro Tools LE.

It's called "The Speedo Limit" and you can listen to it here:

http://www.soundclick.com/artist/8 [...] _music.htm

This should give you an idea of what this mic sounds like. I love mine. (In
the platonic sense, of course)

(To the group: my apologies if it's a breach of etiquette to post a link
like this in here. Just wanted this guy to hear the mic.)

malachi

<yoda_muppet@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126020079.452719.226100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> To JP:
>
> Thanks for the reply. I have never used a tube mic, mostly my
> experience is with inexpensive large condensors, small condensors, and
> sm57s. Since I record a limited number or instruments these have
> worked quite well for me. I'm currently looking for something to
> polish the vocal sound. Suggestions are welcome.
>

Reply to malachi

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

<yoda_muppet@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126019713.896192.229170@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hi and thanks for the replys. By Fuzz, I guess maybe fizz or sizzle
> would have been a better word. What I'm referring to is a nice
> detailed sound around 4k, and a nice smooth but not boomy low end.
>
> Thanks again.
>

Not sure about the T3 but I have a C1 and it's EXTREMELY bright. But I'm
guessing you want smooth and bright which I would not characterize the C1
as. Don't limit yourself to "toob" or even condenser mics.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

> I'm looking for a condensor mic mainly for male pop and folk vocals. I
> haven't read a lot about the T3 but a lot of the other mics from studio
> projects get great reviews. I really need something with that nice
> tube fuzz sound, but i don't want anything annoyingly bright on the
> top. A mic that smooths out nasal sounds would be a nice bonus.
>
> SP T3 good for this? Any other suggestions (in the sub $500 price
> range).

Studio Projects use Chinese-made diaphrams, like many other budget brands, I
would expect it to perform no better than the cheaper Apex and Nady ones
(same mic, different label and price). If you can live without the
multi-pattern feature, the Rode NTK certainly outclasses the Apex 460.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

This will depend on the capsule, not whether tube or FET electronics are
used.

JP

<yoda_muppet@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:1126019713.896192.229170@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hi and thanks for the replys. By Fuzz, I guess maybe fizz or sizzle
> would have been a better word. What I'm referring to is a nice
> detailed sound around 4k, and a nice smooth but not boomy low end.
>
> Thanks again.
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

You should try a variety of mics, pick the ones that you prefer and try to
figure out why.

JP

<yoda_muppet@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:1126020079.452719.226100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> To JP:
>
> Thanks for the reply. I have never used a tube mic, mostly my
> experience is with inexpensive large condensors, small condensors, and
> sm57s. Since I record a limited number or instruments these have
> worked quite well for me. I'm currently looking for something to
> polish the vocal sound. Suggestions are welcome.
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"Zigakly" <no@no.no> wrote in message
news:dflluf$t9p$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
>
> Studio Projects use Chinese-made diaphrams, like many other budget brands,
> I
> would expect it to perform no better than the cheaper Apex and Nady ones
> (same mic, different label and price). If you can live without the
> multi-pattern feature, the Rode NTK certainly outclasses the Apex 460.
>

While I don't agree with some who claim the SP mics are "indistinguishable
from the high-end brands" they are much above the
Apex/Nady/average-Chinese-knockoff. They are very good mics for the money.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Thanks. I think i will try some soon.

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > SP T3. Any real experiences?
Go to:

There are 847 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them