In world champs 2004 at quad opteron 2.0Ghz diep got about 380k nps in
openingsposition.
tested is a 32 bits executable that reached:
529k nps at dual core dual opteron (4 processes).
It's just incredible. Scaling 3.92
Quad opteron world champs 2004 scaled 3.93
This was a net2003 executable compiled in 32 bits. Intel c++ compiles were
slower and 64 bits intel compiler i didn't manage to work at my k7 machine.
64 bits visual c++ compiler i do not own currently.
Archived from groups: rec.games.chess.computer (More info?)
Huh?
"Vincent Diepeveen" <diep@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:4270d34b$0$159$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=667&pid=2543 >
> In world champs 2004 at quad opteron 2.0Ghz diep got about 380k nps in
> openingsposition.
>
> tested is a 32 bits executable that reached:
> 529k nps at dual core dual opteron (4 processes).
> It's just incredible. Scaling 3.92
> Quad opteron world champs 2004 scaled 3.93
>
> This was a net2003 executable compiled in 32 bits. Intel c++ compiles were
> slower and 64 bits intel compiler i didn't manage to work at my k7
> machine. 64 bits visual c++ compiler i do not own currently.
>
>
>
Archived from groups: rec.games.chess.computer (More info?)
"Vincent Diepeveen" <diep@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:4270d34b$0$159$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>
> This was a net2003 executable compiled in 32 bits. Intel c++ compiles were
> slower
Compile on a Xeon and run the binary on the Opteron.
It will use SSE2 that way.
Archived from groups: rec.games.chess.computer (More info?)
SSE2 doesn't help for DIEP. it only slows down.
Chess is just integer work.
Diep is a 32 bits program.
"Frank de Groot" <franciad@online.no> wrote in message
news:rUece.8184$ai7.196852@news2.e.nsc.no...
> "Vincent Diepeveen" <diep@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:4270d34b$0$159$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>>
>> This was a net2003 executable compiled in 32 bits. Intel c++ compiles
>> were slower
>
> Compile on a Xeon and run the binary on the Opteron.
> It will use SSE2 that way.
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.