Teaching an old dog new tricks. If you have ever tried it, it can be
frustrating; especially if your the dog.
I have an old-school engineering background, large format console, lots
of channels, EQ's, insert for processing, then bussing to those lovely
2" behemoths. Inline monitoring design... it was all so easy.. right
there in front of you.. all hands on.
Now I need to set up a digistudio around a ProTools HD system and I find
myself pulling out my hair to know what to put around it. I have been a
faithful MOTU DP user in my last few years. But never needing to record
more than one or two live tracks at a time, a couple of nice channel
strips have served me well. But now I need at least 16 simultaneous
inputs, and I hate mouse mixing. So I want some kind of front end where
I can use EQ and Dynamics on each input BEFORE it hits the digital
realm, easy to use foldback system, then have some tactile controller to
mix and control the DAW with. It there such a beast? or am I looking at
a rack full of pre's, and eq's and comp's and some control surface for
the back end?
Is there a digital mixer where the eq and dynamics won't induce a
perceived latency that you have found that works and sounds great? I am
just not savvy on the new stuff to know. Your expert advice is
appreciated.
"Guitrzman" <ron@nospam.harvestrecords.com> wrote in message
news:ron-A56F29.06371909092005@news1.west.earthlink.net...
> or am I looking at a rack full of pre's, and eq's and comp's and some
control surface
> for the back end?
I don't really understand. It seems to me that you either use a computer
interrface to control all 16 channels, or you need an individual set of
controls for each channel.
Let's take a scenario. Suppose you've recorded some tracks, and you find
that in the mix, you want to cut the bass guitar by 3dB around 200hz.
What interface do you want to use to achieve this?
>
> I don't really understand. It seems to me that you either use a computer
> interrface to control all 16 channels, or you need an individual set of
> controls for each channel.
>
> Let's take a scenario. Suppose you've recorded some tracks, and you find
> that in the mix, you want to cut the bass guitar by 3dB around 200hz.
>
> What interface do you want to use to achieve this?
>
> Tim
Tim, thanks for the question. On the backend(mix) there is no problem
other than just having some kind of tactile control like a Mackie HUI or
whatever because I'll be using the Protools or MOTU plug-ins and such to
mix within the computer. It more the input side that I have questions
about and wanting it all in the same console/controller. But the
feedback and further research leads me to think I am looking at
something like a Control 24 or 02R, or the like. That serves both as a
multi-input console and DAW control Surface. What have you found to be
succesful?
In article <ron-FB2DCF.12481309092005@news1.west.earthlink.net>,
Guitrzman <ron@nospam.harvestrecords.com> wrote:
> >
> > I don't really understand. It seems to me that you either use a computer
> > interrface to control all 16 channels, or you need an individual set of
> > controls for each channel.
> >
> > Let's take a scenario. Suppose you've recorded some tracks, and you find
> > that in the mix, you want to cut the bass guitar by 3dB around 200hz.
> >
> > What interface do you want to use to achieve this?
> >
> > Tim
>
>
> Tim, thanks for the question. On the backend(mix) there is no problem
> other than just having some kind of tactile control like a Mackie HUI or
> whatever because I'll be using the Protools or MOTU plug-ins and such to
> mix within the computer. It more the input side that I have questions
> about and wanting it all in the same console/controller. But the
> feedback and further research leads me to think I am looking at
> something like a Control 24 or 02R, or the like. That serves both as a
> multi-input console and DAW control Surface. What have you found to be
> succesful?
AS a follow up, What are most you Protools guys using when you have a
rhythm section session, orchestra or other session that requires
multiple inputs? And are you just going out of a bunch of rack mounted
pre's into the digi interface? Just trying to educate myself on the
options out there! Thanks!
"Guitrzman" <ron@nospam.harvestrecords.com> wrote in message
news:ron-FB2DCF.12481309092005@news1.west.earthlink.net...
"What have you found to be succesful?"
I use a mouse. I don't do any processing of the signal on input. Once all
the tracks are recorded in 24-bit audio, then I apply any signal processing.
(I don't use Pro Tools, by the way; I use Cubasis and Cubase.)
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:48:12 GMT, Guitrzman
<ron@nospam.harvestrecords.com> wrote:
>Tim, thanks for the question. On the backend(mix) there is no problem
>other than just having some kind of tactile control like a Mackie HUI or
>whatever because I'll be using the Protools or MOTU plug-ins and such to
>mix within the computer. It more the input side that I have questions
>about and wanting it all in the same console/controller. But the
>feedback and further research leads me to think I am looking at
>something like a Control 24 or 02R, or the like. That serves both as a
>multi-input console and DAW control Surface. What have you found to be
>succesful?
You could use the Mackie or Protools controllers for mixing, but I
think what you really want is a Euphonics board. They have boards
that are all analogue components but control digital systems. They
have a knob for each function so you can grab and turn them like you
expect on a real board. This works for both the front end and mixing.
I only used it on one project, but I was impressed. It wasn't
completely intuitive, but it is thousands of times better that a
mouse.
I personally have the Mackie controller which I half use. It didn't
integrate as well with Nuendo as I hoped, and is currently crashing my
system when I open and older file, since I've updated to XP.
"Tim Martin" <tim2718281@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:_toUe.3314$yF2.228@newsfe6-win.ntli.net...
>
> "Guitrzman" <ron@nospam.harvestrecords.com> wrote in message
> news:ron-FB2DCF.12481309092005@news1.west.earthlink.net...
>
> "What have you found to be succesful?"
>
> I use a mouse. I don't do any processing of the signal on input. Once
> all
> the tracks are recorded in 24-bit audio, then I apply any signal
> processing.
> (I don't use Pro Tools, by the way; I use Cubasis and Cubase.)
>
> Tim
I currently do exactly the same but I use Logic.
However, I'm shortly upgrading to multiple inputs (8 is about the most I can
afford) and I'm looking seriously at the Tascam FW-1884. I think you can
chain a few together to get more channels, and it seems like a pretty good
control surface with inserts etc. Not sure if it's compatible with ProTools.
http://www.dv247.com/invt/17449?so [...] k&ad=17449
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.