Archived from groups: rec.games.chess.computer (
More info?)
On the internet you see players with ratings of over 3000, because they play
against slightly lesser players all the time, so they gather points.
Engine fritz for instance mixxes in and gets wins all the time, getting
rating of 3200, sometimes.
That doesn't mean they are actually that strong. On the bottom half of the
lists are people with lower ratings than factually true.
The only way to find out is to try.
<JVMerlino@aol.com> schreef in bericht
news:1117907528.667565.274500@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> It really depends on what rating range of personalities you are playing
> against. In general, the ratings for the mid-range personalities
> (1000-1800) are within 100-150 rating points of their USCF equivalent
> (and they are typically too high -- meaning that a CMX personality that
> is rated 1450 is likely to be equivalent to about 1300-1350 USCF).
>
> The low-end personalities (less than 1000) play so randomly, for the
> most part, that their ratings are simply estimates, as there are very
> few people who play that way "in real life".
>
> The high-end personalities (greater than 1800) also tend to be a bit
> higher ranked than their USCF equivalents, but typically by less than
> 100 points, and usually no more than by 50 points.
>
> Of course, this is based on my knowledge of how the personalities were
> rated for CM7000 through CM9000. I don't think the new programming team
> changed the personalities, nor the way that the ratings for them were
> calculated. So it is a pretty good guess that everything in CMX is very
> similar to what it was in CM9000.
>
> jm
>