Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
I'm renting an apartment that comes furnished with a Sony Wega
KV-HR36M61 TV and I'm playing DVDs through a Pioneer Elite DV-59AVi
player. It supports and decodes DVD-Audio, SACD, DTS, and DD 5.1
among others.
Anyway, I can't afford an awesome A/V receiver at the moment, so I'm
going to hold off on getting that for a little while. Since the
decoding can be handled by the player, could I get some high end PC
speakers (Klipsch, Altec Lansing, etc..) and still reap the benefits
of DVD-Audio, DTS, and DD? When I eventually get a high end receiver
the computer speakers would be put where they belong, on a computer.
Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
If it has a useful volume control and suitable inputs. A cheap HTIB
might be easier.
Kal
On 4 Jul 2004 14:53:03 GMT, jprior@postmark.net (James) wrote:
>I'm renting an apartment that comes furnished with a Sony Wega
>KV-HR36M61 TV and I'm playing DVDs through a Pioneer Elite DV-59AVi
>player. It supports and decodes DVD-Audio, SACD, DTS, and DD 5.1
>among others.
> Anyway, I can't afford an awesome A/V receiver at the moment, so I'm
>going to hold off on getting that for a little while. Since the
>decoding can be handled by the player, could I get some high end PC
>speakers (Klipsch, Altec Lansing, etc..) and still reap the benefits
>of DVD-Audio, DTS, and DD? When I eventually get a high end receiver
>the computer speakers would be put where they belong, on a computer.
>
>Thanks,
>James
Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
In article <cc95kf017od@news3.newsguy.com>,
jprior@postmark.net (James) wrote:
> Since the
> decoding can be handled by the player, could I get some high end PC
> speakers (Klipsch, Altec Lansing, etc..) and still reap the benefits
> of DVD-Audio, DTS, and DD? When I eventually get a high end receiver
> the computer speakers would be put where they belong, on a computer.
Honestly, I think you would be better off with a cheap Home Theater in
the Box. First, the "benefits" will require at least five speakers and
a subwoofer. Second, even if you can connect five speakers to the
sound card in your PC (you _do_ have a sound card?), will it be able
to handle amplifying the signal for those speakers?
HTiBs start under $100 and probably will be competitive in price and
performance with any sound card/computer speaker combo you can come up
with for the same money.
Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
> > Since the
> > decoding can be handled by the player, could I get some high end PC
> > speakers (Klipsch, Altec Lansing, etc..) and still reap the benefits
> > of DVD-Audio, DTS, and DD? When I eventually get a high end receiver
> > the computer speakers would be put where they belong, on a computer.
>
> Honestly, I think you would be better off with a cheap Home Theater in
> the Box. First, the "benefits" will require at least five speakers and
> a subwoofer. Second, even if you can connect five speakers to the
> sound card in your PC (you _do_ have a sound card?), will it be able
> to handle amplifying the signal for those speakers?
>
> HTiBs start under $100 and probably will be competitive in price and
> performance with any sound card/computer speaker combo you can come up
> with for the same money.
>
> sd
The PC speakers would be self powered(the top end Klipsch, Creative
Labs, Altec, etc...are self powered like subs), so the sound card
wouldn't amplify the signal in this case. Also, I can connect five
speakers to my sound card, it even decodes dolby digital 5.1.
Thanks for the advice, it seems the cheap HT route is worth
considering.
Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
James <jprior@postmark.net> wrote:
> I'm renting an apartment that comes furnished with a Sony Wega
> KV-HR36M61 TV and I'm playing DVDs through a Pioneer Elite DV-59AVi
> player. It supports and decodes DVD-Audio, SACD, DTS, and DD 5.1
> among others.
> Anyway, I can't afford an awesome A/V receiver at the moment, so I'm
> going to hold off on getting that for a little while. Since the
> decoding can be handled by the player, could I get some high end PC
> speakers (Klipsch, Altec Lansing, etc..) and still reap the benefits
> of DVD-Audio, DTS, and DD?
Or even some low-end speakers (as long as they are active, that
is, there is an amplifier somewhere). My first surround system was
a no-name DVD player and a 5.1 set from Creative Labs and it worked,
although neither the amplifier (integrated in the subwoofer) nor the
speakers were high-quality.
This is assuming that by "benefits" you mean the multi-channel
capabilities. If you mean the higher signal to noise ratio and
extended frequency response of DVD-Audio then you would need a
better amplifier and speakers than usually available for computers
(not to mention the superhuman ears .
Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro <rps@rena.mat.uc.pt> wrote in message news:<rKdGc.11958$JR4.8424@attbi_s54>...
> James <jprior@postmark.net> wrote:
> > I'm renting an apartment that comes furnished with a Sony Wega
> > KV-HR36M61 TV and I'm playing DVDs through a Pioneer Elite DV-59AVi
> > player. It supports and decodes DVD-Audio, SACD, DTS, and DD 5.1
> > among others.
>
> Pioneer Elite DV59-AVi
> http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/ [...] 07,00.html > So it has 5.1 analogue outputs, correct ?
Yep.
> > Anyway, I can't afford an awesome A/V receiver at the moment, so I'm
> > going to hold off on getting that for a little while. Since the
> > decoding can be handled by the player, could I get some high end PC
> > speakers (Klipsch, Altec Lansing, etc..) and still reap the benefits
> > of DVD-Audio, DTS, and DD?
>
> Or even some low-end speakers (as long as they are active, that
> is, there is an amplifier somewhere). My first surround system was
> a no-name DVD player and a 5.1 set from Creative Labs and it worked,
> although neither the amplifier (integrated in the subwoofer) nor the
> speakers were high-quality.
>
> This is assuming that by "benefits" you mean the multi-channel
> capabilities. If you mean the higher signal to noise ratio and
> extended frequency response of DVD-Audio then you would need a
> better amplifier and speakers than usually available for computers
> (not to mention the superhuman ears .
Yea, multi-channel capability more than anything else. Your correct
that I wouldn't get the same sound reproduction with even high end PC
speakers, but at first I just want to support DTS, DD, and DVD-Audio.
I'll worry about better sound later when I have more loot.
Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
James wrote:
> I'm renting an apartment that comes furnished with a Sony Wega
> KV-HR36M61 TV and I'm playing DVDs through a Pioneer Elite DV-59AVi
> player. It supports and decodes DVD-Audio, SACD, DTS, and DD 5.1
> among others.
> Anyway, I can't afford an awesome A/V receiver at the moment, so I'm
> going to hold off on getting that for a little while.
Get a used Dolby Digital/Pro Logic receiver instead. It does 5.1,
but not DTS, so many older models are being replaced to buy the
new processing modes.
For well under $100 you should be able to locate something like
an old Kenwood KR-V series or simmilar. Sure, it only puts
out 20-30WPC at the rear channels, but it blows the doors off
of the HITB toys.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.