Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (
More info?)
kurttrail wrote:
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> kurttrail wrote:
>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>> health_wellness@solution4u.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> No matter what type of copy protection scheme that has ever
>>>>>>>> been devised, there was always a lot smarter pirate out there
>>>>>>>> figuring how to get around it. These companies just have to
>>>>>>>> face the facts that the pirates are a lot smarter than they
>>>>>>>> are and that treating the honest paying customers like
>>>>>>>> criminals by making them prove they didn't steal the software
>>>>>>>> (Activation) will never stop the pirates who don't have to
>>>>>>>> deal the activation or verification in the first place.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You know the real funny thing about this and another example of
>>>>>>>> how stupid companies like MS and Symantec and other activation
>>>>>>>> advocates are, look how much money they poured into the
>>>>>>>> development, maintenance and manning of the activation scheme
>>>>>>>> to stop piracy of which pirates never ever see or have to
>>>>>>>> contend with. I mean, these idiots are world class when it
>>>>>>>> comes to brain farts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> NIK
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ***Email Address is a Spam Trap***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> kurttrail wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Like the pirates wouldn't get around that too! Please!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Copy-protection:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> a.) Doesn't work.
>>>>>>>>> b.) Ends up stopping more legitimate users than illegitimate
>>>>>>>>> by a large margin.
>>>>>>>>> c.) Adds to the cost of developing products so that the price
>>>>>>>>> of the product doesn't decrease over time.
>>>>>>>>> d.) The software piracy rate was much higher in 1994 before
>>>>>>>>> the PC boom really got going than in 2000 when MS first
>>>>>>>>> introduced copy-protection into the mainstream.
>>>>>>>>>
http://www.kurttrail.com/kblog/kblogarch/00000002.php
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The activation schemes are not designed to stop dedicated
>>>>>> pirates. They are designed to stop casual copying in the home or
>>>>>> small office. Microsoft, for crying out loud, puts out a version
>>>>>> of Windows - the corporate version - that doesn't require
>>>>>> activation; essentially defacto handing Windows to the pirates
>>>>>> and saying "Go to it". I explained the probable reasons for all
>>>>>> this. It's not that they take moral issue with pirating; it's
>>>>>> that they allow/disallow it according to how it will affect
>>>>>> their profit. I think they should send an upright consistent
>>>>>> message, their accountants think otherwise and currently they
>>>>>> are going with their accountants. That could change. But, at
>>>>>> this point, considering this, their talking all high
>>>>>> holier-than-thou to the consumer is a bit hard to swallow.
>>>>>
>>>>> The reason VL has no PA is that MS bowed down to the pressure of
>>>>> their corporate clients. Period.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Peace!
>>>>> Kurt
>>>>> Self-anointed Moderator
>>>>> microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
>>>>>
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
>>>>> "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
>>>>> "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
>>>
>>> Right - there was profit in their releasing a version which could
>>> act as a mastercopy for pirating. If they didn't, some corps
>>> wouldn't have upgraded because of the difficulties inherent in the
>>> WPA process. But if Microsoft were steadfast against pirating,
>>> they'd have stuck to their guns ...
>>>
>>> ... And that's the rub, the problem with morality, eh? To have
>>> some it costs ya.
>>
>> PA is not about piracy, but about control. It cannot control it's
>> corporate customers, without them getting in an Anti-Trust frensy.
>> And they can afford to lobby the government to go after MS again.
>>
>> Small business, and individuals don't have that kind of power. PA is
>> meant to control their behavior. Behavior modification through
>> technology. And only MS's non-corporate paying customers are a part
>> of the experiment of mass behavior modification.
>>
>> You accept PA, you accept the FACT that you are MS's lab rat! Go
>> push the lever that gives you a pellet of food! Good Rat!
>>
>> The Piracy Rate was declining long before MS introduced PA into
>> mainstream software. If anything Since the introduction of PA, the
>> Piracy Rate's decline has leveled off since its introduction.
>>
>> --
>> Peace!
>> Kurt
>> Self-anointed Moderator
>> microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
>>
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
>> "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
>> "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
And I thought I was cynical! LOL I've been reduced to a lab rat.