Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
I've been seeing great reviews for the Musical Fidelity Tube Buffer for 399.
Has anyone bought this item, if so what do you think of it? Is there
anything to the claims of improved sound and more realism, or is this all
hype?
Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
In article <cq06n201bjd@news3.newsguy.com>, wdunlap@ucwphilly.rr.com says...
> I've been seeing great reviews for the Musical Fidelity Tube Buffer for 399.
> Has anyone bought this item, if so what do you think of it? Is there
> anything to the claims of improved sound and more realism, or is this all
> hype?
It will definately have an effect on the sound. It's up to you to decide if
it's better or not. It may be a welcome thing in systems with a thin/dry
sound. I had the first X10-D few years ago and went thru a few amps and
speakers while I had it. It worked in some setups, and not that well in
others.
Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
On 18 Dec 2004 03:04:02 GMT, "Wayne T" <wdunlap@ucwphilly.rr.com>
wrote:
>I've been seeing great reviews for the Musical Fidelity Tube Buffer for 399.
>Has anyone bought this item, if so what do you think of it? Is there
>anything to the claims of improved sound and more realism, or is this all
>hype?
It's all hype. This item is a notorious scam, as it is not a true
buffer, but has a gain of 1dB, not enough for it to sound louder, but
enough for it to sound 'better', with more 'inner detail'.
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
On 18 Dec 2004 03:04:02 GMT, "Wayne T" <wdunlap@ucwphilly.rr.com>
wrote:
>I've been seeing great reviews for the Musical Fidelity Tube Buffer for 399.
>Has anyone bought this item, if so what do you think of it? Is there
>anything to the claims of improved sound and more realism, or is this all
>hype?
While it can improve a situation in which there is a signal level or
impedance mismatch between the player and the preamp, it can otherwise
only be a filter, removing or emphasizing something, but it cannot add
information.
Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
"Wayne T" <wdunlap@ucwphilly.rr.com> wrote in message
news:cq06n201bjd@news3.newsguy.com...
> I've been seeing great reviews for the Musical Fidelity Tube Buffer
for 399.
> Has anyone bought this item, if so what do you think of it? Is
there
> anything to the claims of improved sound and more realism, or is
this all
> hype?
If it's what I think it is, the MF Tube Buffer is nothing more than a
unity gain circuit that slightly degrades the sound that went into it
without amplifying it. IOW just a device for adding "tube sound" to
an otherwise perfect signal. If this device is properly designed, you
will not be able to tell whether it's in the circuit or not; it will
have no sonic effect. This being the case, my guess is that MF has
purposely designed the buffer to alter the signal slightly so that
it's always possible to tell when it's in-circuit.
Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
Wayne T wrote:
> I've been seeing great reviews for the Musical Fidelity Tube Buffer for 399.
> Has anyone bought this item, if so what do you think of it? Is there
> anything to the claims of improved sound and more realism, or is this all
> hype?
This device is to be used between the CD player's output and the preamp.
There is no way that it can *improve* the sound, in the accuracy sense.
It can only add noise, distortion, and errors in the frequency response.
If noise, distortion or frequency errors can add more *realism* to you,
then by all means go for an audition.
Archived from groups: rec.audio.high-end (More info?)
Chung wrote:
> Wayne T wrote:
>> I've been seeing great reviews for the Musical Fidelity Tube Buffer
>> for 399. Has anyone bought this item, if so what do you think of it?
>> Is there anything to the claims of improved sound and more realism,
>> or is this all hype?
>
> This device is to be used between the CD player's output and the
> preamp. There is no way that it can *improve* the sound, in the
> accuracy sense. It can only add noise, distortion, and errors in the
> frequency response. If noise, distortion or frequency errors can add
> more *realism* to you, then by all means go for an audition.
Must be a Wavac for the poor then.
--
ciao Ban
Bordighera, Italy
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.