Mobile GPUs - ATI vs. NVidia?

Forum Laptops & Notebooks : General Laptops & Notebooks - Mobile GPUs - ATI vs. NVidia?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Hey everyone,

I'm about to buy a new laptop and my choice has narrowed to a Dell Inspiron 1520 vs. Acer Aspire 5720G.

While the Acer boasts a better CPU by far (T7100 v T5250) im not sure as to the GPU in the configurations (Rest is about the same, while the Dell is around 300$ more in price - but i guess im paying for the label there too). The Acer has a 256mb HD 2300 PCI-E mobile GPU while the Dell boasts a 256mb nVidia GeForce Go 8600M GT, which one of these 2 are a better performer?

Im hoping the GeForce is "leaps and bounds" ahead so it justifies me going for that one even if its a lesser CPU and more expensive - simply because i've had 2 Acers now in the past 4 years and the second one was a disaster from the start (defect Mobo, blown capacitors, bad case design overall ...). I'd like the Dell for the change but its quite a leap in price...

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

The GF8600M would destroy the HD2300 in games and also has DX10 support while the HD2300 is a DX9 chip, both would be equal in day to day apps, and the HD2300 might barely edge the GF8600M in some HD video playback, some feature like noise reduction and AA might be weak on the HD2300.

So overal I'd say the GF8600M is far and away better in games and in everything else I'd say they're equal when everything is +/-.

------------------------------ You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe

TheGreatGrapeApe wrote :

The GF8600M would destroy the HD2300 in games and also has DX10 support while the HD2300 is a DX9 chip, both would be equal in day to day apps, and the HD2300 might barely edge the GF8600M in some HD video playback, some feature like noise reduction and AA might be weak on the HD2300.

So overal I'd say the GF8600M is far and away better in games and in everything else I'd say they're equal when everything is +/-.



I agree. From what I have heard the HD2300 is just a rebranded an slightly update X1450 or something like that. Not worth it IMO. In this case 8600mGT FTW.

------------------------------ LAPTOP: Sager NP5760|T7200|2gb DDR2-667| 100gb 7200rpm HDD| 512mb 7950GTX|17'' WUXGA

Desktop: Core2 E7200 | Corsair 2gb DDR2-800 | Gigabyte EP35-DS3L | 250gb Seagate Barracuda | MSI GTX260 (192 SP) | Corsair VX550 | Antec 300 case
Reply to lostandwandering

Yeah it's basically an X1300/1400 with the dedicated UMD hardware, thus an HD2300 and not X2300.

------------------------------ You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe

When will they ever stop rebranding Vid cards??????/

Reply to HardWareBoss

sorry to ask another question here, but it is related to the subject

is the 8400m better than the 2300hd ?

thx in advance

------------------------------ q6600 @ 3.2|1:1 with 4gig G.E.I.L. 800 mhz cas4|Asus Maximus|2*320Gb RAID0|1*160Gb OS|Stacker 832|8800 gtx @ 610/2000|Xfi Xtreme gamer|Odin Gt 800W|TR ultra 120 Extreme|LG flatron 22'| life is good!!
Reply to exarrkun

I would think so. The X1400 was about the same as the 7300/7400go and the HD2300 is only an X1400 with some new stuff where as the 8400 is built off a new core. The 8400 outperforms the 7300/7400 so you could assume it would beat the HD2300. Plus the 8400 is an actual DX10 card where as the 2300 is still only DX9.

------------------------------ LAPTOP: Sager NP5760|T7200|2gb DDR2-667| 100gb 7200rpm HDD| 512mb 7950GTX|17'' WUXGA

Desktop: Core2 E7200 | Corsair 2gb DDR2-800 | Gigabyte EP35-DS3L | 250gb Seagate Barracuda | MSI GTX260 (192 SP) | Corsair VX550 | Antec 300 case
Reply to lostandwandering

I agree GF8400M > MHD2300.

IMO both the MHD2400 and GF8400M are in a different league.

------------------------------ You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe

allrighty

one last question
is the 2300hd enough for playing css on a 17 inch widescreen laptop?

------------------------------ q6600 @ 3.2|1:1 with 4gig G.E.I.L. 800 mhz cas4|Asus Maximus|2*320Gb RAID0|1*160Gb OS|Stacker 832|8800 gtx @ 610/2000|Xfi Xtreme gamer|Odin Gt 800W|TR ultra 120 Extreme|LG flatron 22'| life is good!!
Reply to exarrkun

CS:S isn't that tough of a game, but I don't think the HD2300 could handle it at native res. If you ran it at a lower res it would still look good and give you better frame rates. I think you should consider a better card though.

------------------------------ LAPTOP: Sager NP5760|T7200|2gb DDR2-667| 100gb 7200rpm HDD| 512mb 7950GTX|17'' WUXGA

Desktop: Core2 E7200 | Corsair 2gb DDR2-800 | Gigabyte EP35-DS3L | 250gb Seagate Barracuda | MSI GTX260 (192 SP) | Corsair VX550 | Antec 300 case
Reply to lostandwandering
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Laptops & Notebooks > General Laptops & Notebooks > Mobile GPUs - ATI vs. NVidia?
Go to:

There are 1154 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them