OK i just got 2X 512MB PC3500 Geil ram, the numbers on the sticker (on the side of the ram) says
CAS 2 6-3-3 1T @ DDR433Mhz PC3500, 2.5v-2.9V.
if i run cpu-Z i get these values
Frequency 133
FSBRAM 1:1
Cas latency 2.0
Ras# to Cas# delay 2
Ras# precharge 2
Cycle time (tras) 4
So what should i set the timings to in my bios..
for 2 more days im running an athlon 2400xp, getting a 2500barton therefore the low frequency..
but should i set my timings to? should i raise those 2's to 3 and cycle time to 6?
I second that opinion if you can get 2 2 2 11 and its nforce use it.
If I glanced at a spilt box of tooth picks on the floor, could I tell you how many are in the pile. Not a chance, But then again I don't have to buy my underware at Kmart.
I'd leave it. You're running the RAM synchronously with the CPU bus which is usually a good idea. 133MHz is DDR266, the standard bus speed for your 2400+. The 2500+ runs a stock bus of 166MHz (DDR333) and your upgrade will reflect that change. The RAM just might run at your current lower latencies using that speed.
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
If you are using an nforce2 board and want the best performance use the tras 11 setting. More and more people are learning this. It first came to light about 6 months ago reasonably common knowledge among nforce2 enthusiasts.
If its not nforce2 stick with lower timings like 2-2-2-6 I belive 2-2-2-6 is the best timmings (performance wise) on a non nforce2 platform.
So if its nforce2 try 2-2-2-11 or 2-3-3-11 or 2.5-3-3-11 0r 2.5-4-4-11
If I glanced at a spilt box of tooth picks on the floor, could I tell you how many are in the pile. Not a chance, But then again I don't have to buy my underware at Kmart.
ok i got the timings to 2-2-2-11 now what would be the best way to test it? would that be to run 3dmark03 with tras from 4 and up to 11 to see whats best? or is there an easier way?
ok i got the timings to 2-2-2-11 now what would be the best way to test it? would that be to run 3dmark03 with tras from 4 and up to 11 to see whats best?
GeekExtreme and MadShrimps used 3DMark2001SE (in addition to other benchmarks) for performing this kind of test as opposed to 3DMark03; just an observation.
One I do know that those timmings 2-2-2-4 will work and probably will pass the memtest86 but you will get software corruption. Im going to try f-ing with my timmings again tonight, 2-3-3-11, 2.5-3-3-11, 2-4-4-11, and 2.5-4-4-11 to see what happens..
Barton 2500+ @ 2200mhz (10x220 vcore @ 1.8)
Asus A7N8X Dlx 440 FSB
1gb Geil GD pc3500 Dual Channel (2-3-3-6)
Segata 80gb SATA 8.5ms seek
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro(420/720)
please post what you find!!
im getting my barton 2500 tomorrow hopefully..
but regardless of beeing able to run 2-2-2-4 , 2-3-3-6, 2-2-2-11 theyre still good ram and will make it possible for me to OC to barton 3200 right??
i mean im hearing something aobut Geil != Asus A7N8X so im getting a bit scared, and debating if i should send em back, cause i only have 8 days to do that in..
In your memtest86 run 2-2-2-11 generated the best results. Go ahead and run 3dmark01. I think it's pretty clear from what i've seen from a number of sources that 2-2-2-11 would be the recommeded timings for this chipset, if obtainable.
Just put together another a7n8x-deluxe and barton system and was able to do those timmings just fine until when I past the 200 clock in dual channel and that when the errors started. I did notice that the northbridge HS was rather hot and probably a better cooler with make it go father than 200.
Barton 2500+ @ 2200mhz (10x220 vcore @ 1.8)
Asus A7N8X Dlx 440 FSB
1gb Geil GD pc3500 Dual Channel (2-3-3-6)
Segata 80gb SATA 8.5ms seek
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro(420/720)
Re: Im going to try f-ing with my timmings again tonight, 2-3-3-11, 2.5-3-3-11, 2-4-4-11, and 2.5-4-4-11 to see what happens..
Just remember Cas has the biggest impact on performance by far so keep it at 2. Only use 2.5 if you cannot get cas 2 with any other combo. In other words I think 2-2-2-6 would preform better than 2.5-2-2-11 but 2-2-2-11 should be better than 2-2-2-6
If I glanced at a spilt box of tooth picks on the floor, could I tell you how many are in the pile. Not a chance, But then again I don't have to buy my underware at Kmart.
I've seen this topic in nforce forums and everyone who tried 2-2-2-11 scored better then 2-2-2 (?) There is a link at the top of the thread showing this.
Not saying your score did not change I'm just suprized is all.
So I guess bumping the precharge delay to 11 should have a positive impact on performance when using 2-2-2
If I glanced at a spilt box of tooth picks on the floor, could I tell you how many are in the pile. Not a chance, But then again I don't have to buy my underware at Kmart.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.