Archived from groups: rec.games.corewar (More info?)
fizmo_master@yahoo.com (Fizmo) wrote in message news:<9f53b5fb.0404270618.21108a1a@posting.google.com>...
> Hey, Neo. You're breaking through my dominance on the LP hill!!! ;-)
> But a really nice result. Koth with a 30pts lead. Congrats
>
> "The King" by "Neo" has challenged the Limited process hill
> ;strategy Long life the king!
>
> Current hill status:
>
> # %W/ %L/ %T Name Author Score Age
> 1 50.9/ 21.7/ 27.4 The King Neo 180.1 1
> ^^^^^
> 2 38.8/ 25.9/ 35.4 Duke Christian Schmidt 151.7 19
> 3 42.3/ 34.4/ 23.2 Muffineer Christian Schmidt 150.2 14
> 4 40.5/ 33.6/ 25.9 Viper's Bugloss Christian Schmidt 147.5 20
> 5 39.3/ 32.1/ 28.6 Reclon 2 G.Labarga 146.5 2
> 6 29.7/ 16.3/ 54.1 Eve 15 bvowk + Fizmo 143.0 48
> 7 40.8/ 40.0/ 19.1 fbomber Michal Janeczek 141.7 100
> 8 42.6/ 45.8/ 11.6 FlipSide Zul Nadzri 139.3 61
> 9 37.4/ 38.3/ 24.3 Revenge of the Silklander Christian Schmidt 136.5 58
> 10 31.2/ 26.4/ 42.4 Roskilde Christian Schmidt 135.9 79
>
> Handshaking Greetings,
>
> Christian
Thanks a lot. I think the Hill needed a new koth. ;-)
Some comments about this:
I'm using a self-win routine that should win against self 50% on first
round, but i don't know why the hell every handshaking warrior i
submitted lose first round against self.
The king is a p-warrior cappable to be koth without cooperation, (i
think it would obtain ~160 pts or so), using the strategies in Royal
guard, Histeric imps and Reclon 2, (i love the last one. It became
koth when submitted :-D ).
I tested an addaptative table switcher, (mutating p^3), and it scores
much better than p^3 against other p-switchers. Unfortunately it
scores much worse against non p-warriors. :-\
Obviously The King makes slaves to suicide, what gives a big advantage
to it/him.
Archived from groups: rec.games.corewar (More info?)
I have told Fizmo that I will assault the LP hill soon but you got there
faster...and most important, with style!! I hope your handshaker will win
100% soon. In fact, I still couldn't formulate the best strategy for LP.
Now i better pay attention to the tiny hill
/Zul Nadzri
"Neogryzor" <neogryzormail@mixmail.com> wrote in message
news:242debe4.0404290247.7311cab1@posting.google.com...
> fizmo_master@yahoo.com (Fizmo) wrote in message
news:<9f53b5fb.0404270618.21108a1a@posting.google.com>...
> > Hey, Neo. You're breaking through my dominance on the LP hill!!! ;-)
> > But a really nice result. Koth with a 30pts lead. Congrats
> >
> > "The King" by "Neo" has challenged the Limited process hill
> > ;strategy Long life the king!
> >
> > Current hill status:
> >
> > # %W/ %L/ %T Name Author Score
Age
> > 1 50.9/ 21.7/ 27.4 The King Neo 180.1
1
> > ^^^^^
> > 2 38.8/ 25.9/ 35.4 Duke Christian Schmidt 151.7
19
> > 3 42.3/ 34.4/ 23.2 Muffineer Christian Schmidt 150.2
14
> > 4 40.5/ 33.6/ 25.9 Viper's Bugloss Christian Schmidt 147.5
20
> > 5 39.3/ 32.1/ 28.6 Reclon 2 G.Labarga 146.5
2
> > 6 29.7/ 16.3/ 54.1 Eve 15 bvowk + Fizmo 143.0
48
> > 7 40.8/ 40.0/ 19.1 fbomber Michal Janeczek 141.7
100
> > 8 42.6/ 45.8/ 11.6 FlipSide Zul Nadzri 139.3
61
> > 9 37.4/ 38.3/ 24.3 Revenge of the Silklander Christian Schmidt 136.5
58
> > 10 31.2/ 26.4/ 42.4 Roskilde Christian Schmidt 135.9
79
> >
> > Handshaking Greetings,
> >
> > Christian
>
> Thanks a lot. I think the Hill needed a new koth. ;-)
>
> Score
> # %W %L %T Name Author Taken Given Age
> 6 32.4 9.3 58.3 Eve 15 bvowk + Fizmo 155.5 86.3
> 21 28.5 10.8 60.7 189602-1978-xt642-2-eve15 bvowk 146.3 93.1
> 2 35.9 33.1 30.9 Muffineer Christian Schmidt 138.7 130.3
> 12 24.6 11.8 63.6 8366-4510-cs-sdk-eve15 bvowk 137.4 99.0
> 3 32.6 29.9 37.5 Duke Christian Schmidt 135.3 127.3
> 9 31.3 39.7 29.0 Revenge of the.... Christian Schmidt 123.0
> 148.0
> 7 35.3 47.6 17.1 fbomber Michal Janeczek 122.9 159.9
> 16 32.1 43.1 24.8 100% Evil Roy van Rijn 121.0 154.2
> 10 23.1 26.1 50.8 Roskilde Christian Schmidt 120.2 129.0
> 23 27.3 34.9 37.7 Achillu 94 LAchi + Fizmo 119.7 142.5
> 14 30.0 42.5 27.5 ~~ The 9th Process ~~ Zul Nadzri 117.5 155.1
> 19 20.0 26.3 53.7 4310-4309-xt430-0-eve15 bvowk 113.7 132.7
> 18 26.3 48.1 25.6 The 8 Kings Christian Schmidt 104.4 170.0
> 20 24.6 45.5 29.9 FlipSide 04 Zul Nadzri 103.7 166.3
> 4 28.3 52.9 18.8 Viper's Bugloss Christian Schmidt 103.6 177.6
> 25 27.6 57.9 14.5 What's This? Revenge? John Metcalf 97.3 188.1
> 26 22.7 50.7 26.5 Repulse 06 Zul Nadzri 94.7 178.7
> 8 22.9 51.6 25.5 FlipSide Zul Nadzri 94.1 180.3
> 15 21.5 51.5 27.0 Dental Disease Christian Schmidt 91.6 181.4
> 17 18.7 47.4 33.9 Mad LP Christian Schmidt 89.9 176.1
> 22 19.4 62.5 18.1 scan G.Labarga 76.3 205.5
> 1 0.4 99.6 0.0 The King Neo 1.2 298.8 <-
> 11 0.0 100.0 0.0 Histeric imps G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> 24 0.0 100.0 0.0 Asfixia G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> 5 0.0 100.0 0.0 Reclon 2 G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> 13 0.0 100.0 0.0 Royal guard G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
>
> That's what i call brute handshake.
>
> Some comments about this:
> I'm using a self-win routine that should win against self 50% on first
> round, but i don't know why the hell every handshaking warrior i
> submitted lose first round against self.
>
> The king is a p-warrior cappable to be koth without cooperation, (i
> think it would obtain ~160 pts or so), using the strategies in Royal
> guard, Histeric imps and Reclon 2, (i love the last one. It became
> koth when submitted :-D ).
> I tested an addaptative table switcher, (mutating p^3), and it scores
> much better than p^3 against other p-switchers. Unfortunately it
> scores much worse against non p-warriors. :-\
> Obviously The King makes slaves to suicide, what gives a big advantage
> to it/him.
>
> Neogryzor
Archived from groups: rec.games.corewar (More info?)
by the way.... you managed to manipulate the PIN for these warriors? 100%
win should be impossible (it has been proven possible in this example) at
this level of hill. Now I am curious....;-/
Archived from groups: rec.games.corewar (More info?)
"Zul Nadzri" <abyss(at)tm.net.my> wrote in message news:<4090f8e4_2@news.tm.net.my>...
> by the way.... you managed to manipulate the PIN for these warriors? 100%
> win should be impossible (it has been proven possible in this example) at
> this level of hill. Now I am curious....;-/
>
> > 11 0.0 100.0 0.0 Histeric imps G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> > 24 0.0 100.0 0.0 Asfixia G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> > 5 0.0 100.0 0.0 Reclon 2 G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> > 13 0.0 100.0 0.0 Royal guard G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> ...
All of them have same pin number, so the King can order slaves to suicide.
Archived from groups: rec.games.corewar (More info?)
Let's hope that you've choosen a high value for the PIN, otherwise I
could easily figure them out and take advantage of them, too ;-)
BTW, is there a value limit for the PIN number?
Fizmo
> > by the way.... you managed to manipulate the PIN for these warriors? 100%
> > win should be impossible (it has been proven possible in this example) at
> > this level of hill. Now I am curious....;-/
> >
> > > 11 0.0 100.0 0.0 Histeric imps G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> > > 24 0.0 100.0 0.0 Asfixia G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> > > 5 0.0 100.0 0.0 Reclon 2 G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> > > 13 0.0 100.0 0.0 Royal guard G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> > ...
>
> All of them have same pin number, so the King can order slaves to suicide.
>
> Neogryzor
Archived from groups: rec.games.corewar (More info?)
Ahaa.. Let's see what happens to the King if the slaves are gone ;-)
"Neogryzor" <neogryzormail@mixmail.com> wrote in message
news:242debe4.0404292336.605e89f5@posting.google.com...
> "Zul Nadzri" <abyss(at)tm.net.my> wrote in message
news:<4090f8e4_2@news.tm.net.my>...
> > by the way.... you managed to manipulate the PIN for these warriors?
100%
> > win should be impossible (it has been proven possible in this example)
at
> > this level of hill. Now I am curious....;-/
> >
> > > 11 0.0 100.0 0.0 Histeric imps G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> > > 24 0.0 100.0 0.0 Asfixia G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> > > 5 0.0 100.0 0.0 Reclon 2 G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> > > 13 0.0 100.0 0.0 Royal guard G.Labarga 0.0 300.0 <-
> > ...
>
> All of them have same pin number, so the King can order slaves to suicide.
>
> Neogryzor
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.