I am going to upgrade my laptop to 4GB of Memory soon. I was wondering which would be a better performance boost. I am either going to get 2x2GB @667 4-4-4-12 or 2x2GB 800 5-5-5-15. I don't know which would be a better use of my money. They are both about the same price.
Get the 667 because as far as I know, your system can not use the 800 and would just clock it down to 667 anyway. The timings on the 667 are better as well. What OS are you using (Vista or XP and 32 or 64bit)?
It looks like it will actually use it at 800mhz. Not really sure if there is a noticeable performance jump from 667 to 800, I would just get whatever is cheaper.
Only reason I asked about the OS (and you probably knew this) is that 32-bit OS' can't read the full 4gb of RAM. Just wanted to make sure you weren't wasting your money.
I figured that was why you were checking the OS and I did know about the limit but I do appreciate you making sure
They are both about the same price ~ $100
If I were to get 800MHz at 4-4-4-12 that would cost about $25 more
The reason I ask is that I have heard that AMD chips are more sensitive to latency due to the memory controller being on the chip so i wondered which would give me the biggest performance jump.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.