Sony's DSC-R1 looks like an SLR but uses a fixed lens and electronic viewfinder, and removes some of the depth of field and other problems common with these cameras. Should you rush out to buy one?
The maximum aperture of f/2.8 in wide-angle position is very satisfactory, but it's only f/4.8 at the telephoto end, which is obviously less attractive. Here again, you see a consequence of the use of a large sensor - you'd need an enormous front element to maintain the same brightness at long focal lengths. In the world of SLRs, zooms with a constant f/2.8 maximum aperture usually don't go beyond 80 mm equivalent, and they can cost more than a whole Sony R1...
This statement is not entirely correct.
There is a wide range of zoom lenses that keep a constant f2.8 aperture. I'm actually selling one on Ebay right now, it is a Nikon AF-mount Sigma 70-210 APO, and it keeps it's f2.8 aperture throughout the zoom range. The current version of that lens is a 70-200 f2.8 and it retails for about $700.00US. The Nikon 80-200 f2.8 version is more expensive, with prices around $900 which is about the same as the Sony's street price.
Just wanted to make sure you were aware of this.
Thanks for the great review!
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.