Whats the LOWEST pixel pitch 19" LCD?

[inquiring]

Who sells a 19" LCD with the LOWEST pixel pitch besides dell, planar, and NEC? Im in the market for a 19" LCD and am going from a SONY Trinitron .22 pixel pitch and DONT want a .29 or .27 PP LCD. What free program can tell me the pixel pitch of a monitor?

Thanks.

 

[Hose]

Who sells a 19" LCD with the LOWEST pixel pitch besides dell, planar, and NEC? Im in the market for a 19" LCD and am going from a SONY Trinitron .22 pixel pitch and DONT want a .29 or .27 PP LCD. What free program can tell me the pixel pitch of a monitor?

Thanks.

No need for a program... they are nearly 100% the same.... SXGA... 1280x1024 resolution = .294mm pixels.

The only 19" UXGA screen I ever heard of was a Planar.

The smallest pixel size you're going to find is UXGA... 1600x1200 or 1920x1200 in widescreen = .255mm pixels.

 

[gohan0032]

This has confused me. Other people and various websites say that the pixel pitch won't change between same size LCD's. But then there are some sites that recommend geting the smallest pixel pitch for the sharpest image. I have seen 19" LCDs listing a 0.264 pixel pitch. For example the SCEPTRE X9g-Naga V. I know 2 people with this LCD and it looks great to me. So is the 0.264mm pixel pitch on 19" LCD's just commercial hype, or is there an actual difference? Newegg has 7 19" LCD's listed as .264mm.

 

[Hose]

Widescreens usually have different pixel sizes than 4:3 or 5:4. And yes, there is *slight* differences in pixel sizes in the widescreens. In fact, some of them are not square but rather rectangular... (ie .283 h, and .238 v)

I seems intuitive that the rectangular ones might have less sharp displays because of the large pixel parameter, but that appears not to be the case from buyer reveiws.

 

[wakkierob]

Hi, I'm WakkieRob and I've seen not much difference between the cheaper Displays and the more expensive one's.
Way are we paying more for no more pixel pitch quality. I heard the less the pixel pitch or gap between each pixel the better but they all seem the same apart from one I saw that was 0.21mm?

 

[cjl]

There are other differences between cheaper and expensive displays. One of the larges is the panel technology. TN displays are the cheapest, but S-PVA are significantly better at both viewing angle and color accuracy, and overall look quite a bit better. S-IPS are the best, but IMHO, both S-IPS and S-PVA are excellent, with only a slight difference between them.