Iᄡm in a position where I have to choose between the aforementioned monitors, the Nokia one at 40ᆲ, the Sony one at 65ᆲ, without being able to examine either in advance (except when picking up my chosen monitor, I can naturally check it, but can´t compare - and I´m not an expert on image quality).
In any case, I need to choose whether itᄡs worth it to spend the extra 25ᆲ for the Sony, and decided to ask for advice from those more knowledgeable about the matter.
The pros on the Sony, as far as I can tell from the specs, are a .2" wider VIS and a reduced size (about 1" off all 3).
But obviously I don´t know about image quality...
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.