I'm about to buy a new computer with these specs: AMD Athlon64 3200+ Clawhammer, MSI K8N Neo Platinum (nVidia nForce3-250GB chipset), and ATI Radeon 9800 256MB, I'm getting 1GB of DDR400 memory to go with it. Unfortunately I've found very few websites that actually do comparison reviews on different RAM types, so I need your help.
The three companies I'm considering for RAM are:
Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
My computer will be used for primarily for light gaming and development applications including Visual Studio.Net, IIS, SQL Server 2000, etc. I'm not a heavy gamer, so I don't think I need Registered memory, nor do I care about superfluous crap like LED's. So I think I can find a decent stick (or paired set) of 1GB of memory for around $250 (+/- $30).
From what I've read about latency, lower is better because every number in the SPD represents clock cycles, and the more time something takes, the less "efficient" it is.
So why would <A HREF="http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=20-145-450&depa=0" target="_new">TWINX1024-3200C2PT</A> (SPD 2-3-3-6) at $234 be cheaper than <A HREF="http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=20-145-500&depa=0" target="_new">TWINX1024-3200</A> (SPD 3-3-3-8) at $255? It's more intuitive that the lower SPD, the better performing the memory is, and therefore the more expensive it would be.
Do any of you have any recommendations for memory for my computer specs in the range of $250 (+/- $30)?
Thanks in advance!
----
~ Digital Cowboy Extraordinaire ~
The three companies I'm considering for RAM are:
Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
My computer will be used for primarily for light gaming and development applications including Visual Studio.Net, IIS, SQL Server 2000, etc. I'm not a heavy gamer, so I don't think I need Registered memory, nor do I care about superfluous crap like LED's. So I think I can find a decent stick (or paired set) of 1GB of memory for around $250 (+/- $30).
From what I've read about latency, lower is better because every number in the SPD represents clock cycles, and the more time something takes, the less "efficient" it is.
So why would <A HREF="http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=20-145-450&depa=0" target="_new">TWINX1024-3200C2PT</A> (SPD 2-3-3-6) at $234 be cheaper than <A HREF="http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=20-145-500&depa=0" target="_new">TWINX1024-3200</A> (SPD 3-3-3-8) at $255? It's more intuitive that the lower SPD, the better performing the memory is, and therefore the more expensive it would be.
Do any of you have any recommendations for memory for my computer specs in the range of $250 (+/- $30)?
Thanks in advance!
----
~ Digital Cowboy Extraordinaire ~