Who builds the best quality laptop computer across the board?
I asked this question yesterday and was informed that I was asking for War and the responder was probably right, so let me explain a little further.
I guess the reason for my sort of general question regarding build quality is that you can find/build an HP, Dell, Gateway, Sony or Mac (just to name a few) with basically the same CPU speed, similar hard drives specs, displays, etc. and they will have widely varying prices. Is there a quality disparity between brands or can you go with the cheapest because the quality is the same as the most expensive one?
I need to purchase two computers this year. One for myself and one for my wife. I use my computer for business use almost exclusively and I travel throughout the country. I am in the printing business so I do occasionally have to send, receive and open large graphic files, but mostly I use typical business software applications. My wife primarily uses her computer for pictures and general internet use and will most likely never leave the house with her computer, but would like the mobility of the laptop so that she can move around the house instead of being stuck in the office with her desktop computer.
My goal is to purchase Laptops that will last for several years with as few hardware problems as possible.
I used to have an Acer at work. Then it was replaced with a Dell which felt very cheap in comparison. In my limited opinion Acers build quality was very good.
My dilema is primarily stemming from the problems I am developing with my Dell Inspiron. It is about 3 years old and was Dell's top of the line laptop just prior to the release of the XPS series and I built it with the best they had to offer at the time. The display has steadily deteriorated over the past year and the hard drive is beginning to make strange mechanical noises. I used to swear by Dell quality. I have heard they have reverted to the lowest bidder scenario on who supplies the components they put in the computers and that scares me a bit if it's true. My wife has a Dell desktop and it's older than mine. It was a well built computer. It has served her well, but she needs a technology upgrade.
I used to have an Acer at work. Then it was replaced with a Dell which felt very cheap in comparison. In my limited opinion Acers build quality was very good.
lol, this question is tough to answer and what you said will help me prove that
My experience is almost the opposite. I've used my brother's Dell and my friend's Acer. The Acer felt like it was made out of cheap plastic and it flexed when picked up. The Dell on the other hand felt more solid and sturdy. I'd like to also throw Sager into the mix for quality units.
I still swear by the macs, they are soild built computers. And for a person in the graphics business the mac is the the gem for it. I have used dell, hp, acer, toshiba and mac in my time (3 years) and hands down the best build and the best computer in my view is a mac.
It's well built and it's got great support and such 90% of repairs if you should ever need one is done in a mac store near you in 1 to 2 days typically. Which is nice to know if something should ever happen. Not to mention you can pick up a refurbished with full warranty for 25% off to keep costs lower.
Go with Lenovo. Mac is good too, but be weary because I bought a Mac and then ended up having to sell it and by a Windows machine because a lot of the new software I needed for work didn't work well with Mac even though they were said to be compatible. Lenovo is a good company with top notch support. Acer's support is terrible, Dell's isn't much better. Lenovo will go as far as to send an expert to your door to fix your laptop all for free if you're still under warranty (3 year warranty comes standard). If you need a reliable laptop, you need Lenovo.
I have an Acer Laptop from about 2006, and I feel it is a very nice laptop and I got it at a decent price. The overal appearance of it isn't as stunning as that of an HP laptop. I also have a HP laptop purchased last year. It also feels quite sturdy and looks nice with tribal type artwork printed on the back of the screen. Dell prices are typically cheap, almost too cheap, sometimes. A friend had an older Dell laptop (had windows XP preinstalled). He barely moved it around, maybe occaisionally for work, and it experienced a hard drive malfunction and broke. I was not as impressed with the build quality. Although it did not feel like I could snap it in half, it felt cheaper and the casing, very thin.
So overall, I would stick to a nice respected name brand like Hewlett-Packard (HP), Toshiba, or even Acer or Lenevo. Dell would be a budget option. I am not saying I would never buy a dell, (maybe a desktop), but I like the design and builds of other comapanies.
I have a good experience and bad experience with toshiba, the first one i bought was great it was a protege tablet, and it still works, few BSODs after being almost 7 years old and all of them was my fault not hardware, it played games of it's times very nicely
my second toshiba overheated o the point i almost got burned by it
my first HP is working like a charm, it has a 9600 and plays games smoothly and multi tasks so good
No experience with ASUS,MSI, lenovo, Sager or Acer but ASUS, MSI, and Sager are top notch, in my opinion ACER is just for show
Anyway i have the worst possible experience with dells except for the desktop XPSs