• Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad

Latest Reviews & Articles

Life At 2 GT/s: 6 GB DDR3-2000 Memory Kits Compared

Life At 2 GT/s: 6 GB DDR3-2000 Memory Kits Compared

Memory vendors put a lot of effort into drumming up excitement over high-end memory kits, but many of those products turn out to be vaporware. We test six DDR3-2000 kits that enthusiasts can actually buy today, and push them as far as they'll go. Read more

DDR3 Memory Scaling On AMD's Phenom II X4

DDR3 Memory Scaling On AMD's Phenom II X4

DDR3 memory is available in speeds ranging from DDR3-800 to DDR3-2133. Which is the best memory choice for AMD’s Phenom II X4? We tested as many speeds as possible using aggressive and conservative timings to find the sweet spot for your next build. Read more

Intel Core i7-975 Extreme And i7-950 Reviewed

Intel Core i7-975 Extreme And i7-950 Reviewed

Today Intel launches two high-end processors that take the place of its i7-965 and i7-940 CPUs. More speed? Same price points? We’ll take it! But are the new chips compelling enough to warrant spending more than you would on an i7-920? Read more

AMD Athlon II X2 / Phenom II X2 And Low-Power CPU Bonanza

AMD Athlon II X2 / Phenom II X2 And Low-Power CPU Bonanza

Eager to let you know it’s been busy, AMD is launching four new processors today: the first Athlon II, a dual-core Phenom II, and two low-power 65W Phenom IIs. We bought ourselves a new Pentium E6300 and let loose with AMD’s latest. Read more

All the Reviews & Articles
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Computer Peripherals > Flat Panels/ LCDs > BenQ FP222W H vs. Samsung 226BW vs. LG L226WT-BF

BenQ FP222W H vs. Samsung 226BW vs. LG L226WT-BF

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

which one is the best overall performance and features plus future proof for high definition 1080p?

thanks.. :)

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

All of them are Hidef but only 1680x1050 Native Resolution 16X10 (not 16X9 of) not 1080p.

Both LG and Samsung are VISTA certified but does not say on Benq.

Samsung 2 ms (G to G)
Benq 6 ms
LG 2ms

Since I have'nt seen these monitors with the specs I would go with LG or Samsung but I lean on LG better, for looks but some might go with Samsung so it's your choice between the two.

Just check the reviews on them, It'll make you deside faster.

Reply to rexter
- 0 +

thank you for the information. yeah it seems both LG and Samsung are ahead in the specification in 19", 20", and 22" widescreen monitor.

unfortunately, only old type of 19" widescreen LG monitor is on stock here in Indonesia.. :(

Reply to chrone
- 0 +

According to a number of tests from asian sites, the Samsung 226BW is the number one panel overall, of all the 22" TN panels followed by the LG227 then the viewsonic 2245. The BenQ was the worst rated model of all the 22" panels. I would definitely go with the samsung, but I should warn you, there's been a number of reports that samsung is changing the type of panels for this model.... Some of these Samsung models use a slightly inferior panel, so be careful about that if you pick it up... Apparantly, there will be an S' at the bottom of the panel if it's a true samsung panel, and an A' if it is not. There being really sneaky about it... Another good panel to consider is the sceptre 22" not as good as the samsung but it's still solid, and it is asthetically the best looking of all the panels IMHO.

Reply to Rookie7
- 0 +

oh okay, i guess i will go with LG monitor as soon as the stock is ready at Surabaya, Indonesia. The LG specification seems lot better in colours than Samsung in some of my friends' opinion, they're kind of regret buying Samsung and prefer to try LG monitor.

Thanks for the info though :)

Reply to chrone
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Computer Peripherals > Flat Panels/ LCDs > BenQ FP222W H vs. Samsung 226BW vs. LG L226WT-BF
Go to:

There are 769 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread. Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links