Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (
More info?)
In article <epRywOwgFHA.1252@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, birelan@yahoo.com
says...
> So, you agree there is no connection between geographic location and IP
> addresses. Any association is pure happenstance and after the fact.
No, I do not agree - for the most part there is a direct connection
between an IP and the geographical location of it's use. When I connect
to my local Road Runner POP I don't get an IP that's based out of Texas
or Canada, my IP is easily found to be in Ohio.
If you mean street level, then yes, there is no direct relation between
IP and the street address of the user with that IP. In most cases you
can determine the City that an IP is being used from.
>
> Leythos wrote:
>
> > In article <uCAYSqvgFHA.3000@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>, birelan@yahoo.com
> > says...
> >
> >>You do realize that IP addresses have NO connection to geographic
> >>locations, or maybe you don't, since then you wouldn't have asked.
> >
> >
> > Actually, while IP addresses are not a certain indication, they are
> > assigned to companies/ISP that tend to cover a region - in general,
> > they, depending on the country, are a relative indicator of what country
> > a IP is being used from. Yes, there are exceptions (as I mentioned), but
> > in general IP's assigned by Foreign countries are not found in other
> > countries.
> >
>
>
--
--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me