Archived from groups: rec.games.int-fiction (More info?)
John Prevost
>One specific problem with the "only three votes: Best (3 points),
>Second Best (2 points) and Third Best (1 point)" idea is that it
>prevents people from participating in the judging if they don't have
>time to play every one of the submitted games.
Not what I meant. The ten games rule would still stand. "Best" would
thus mean "best game of the ten I've played", assuming you hadn't had
time to play more.
>It's true that those people (including myself) can skew the
>results
You're welcome to skew the results as much as you like, as long as
your reasons are legitimate. The only practically enforceable way of
ensuring that is making the votes too valuable to squander.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.