i hear people swear up and down favoring one or the other. depends on the individual i guess. try a FAIR experiment, under normal room lighting and with common source material...LCDs being better in bright light, CRTs better in darker. settings..
CRT - 75 hz. vsync on.
LCD - digital connection (dvi/hdmi). set source material to native resolution. turn down the brightness (most are made too bright in order to hide poor contrast ratios) - then view the "useable contrast ratio" - the one you will be seeing when brightness is accepable. vsync on. see if ghosting bothers you while scrolling text (try them side by side. i say that because its a fact people see things not otherwise noticed that way - like ghosting on lcds).
proper calibration, latest drivers... what else ok hope it helps.
LCD is just generally better because it doesn't have radiation like CRT's do, also they don't flicker because the entire screen isn't constantly updated like they are on CRT's..
LCD is WAY better to sit in front of then CRT's.. without question
LCD is just generally better because it doesn't have radiation like CRT's do, also they don't flicker because the entire screen isn't constantly updated like they are on CRT's..
LCD is WAY better to sit in front of then CRT's.. without question
Not entirelly accurate. It is true that LCDs have near zero elecrtromagnetic emission but that does not make them less strenuous to the eye as per se. A good CRT working at 85 or 100 Hz is completely flicker free. Moreover its vastly superior clarity requires of the eye less effort in order to focus on fine details, say, text. That is exasperated by the tendency of manufacturers to turn up the brightness in TFTs in order to cover up for their poorer contrast. CRTs on the other hand with their more vivid coulours can be more tiresome in games but then again their image quality and colour depth is head and shoulders above that of TFTs.
IMO CRT displays for CAD and graphic design workstations demanded larger and higher resolution displays that looked great but for a higher end 21" display was retailing at over $2,000... Then started running dual 21" CRT's... that and a high heat output workstation really tested the cooling in your room at times...
There was a time when CRT's were proven and matured, plus people were willing to pay extra for quality and size which engineering wise manufacturing larger ntm widescreen 24"+CRT's was not practical...
Thankfully that transition period has passed allowing LCD technology to mature and improve response times and colour accuracy to arguably similar quality... ntm displays similar to Dell's 2407 LCD going for $600 is an incredible value on what I perceive as a near flawless monitor...
But you usually get what you pay for, and their are a more crappier CRT's in the market than great ones due to pricing mainly, not lack of the technology... likewise... there are also more crappy LCD's out there then great ones too... mainly due to pricing and not lack of current technology...
You may be staring at a 6-bit TN panel which is using Hi-FRC; High Frame Rate Control; which is a method for dithering to reproduce 16.7m colors from a palette of only 262k colors.
Hi-FRC flashes quickly between two colors to reproduce a color a TN panel simply cannot reproduce otherwise. For example, suppose a TN panel cannot reproduce purple. Using Hi-FRC the pixels flashes between blue and red so quickly that your brain registers solid purple.
There are a few people who are photosensitive and two of the more mild effects are headaches and eye fatigue. The most extreme reaction would be an epileptic seizure.
------------------------------Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP
Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx
HI,
Ever since I had lazor surgery on my eyes I am now extra sensitive to monitors.
with my experience here are all the things that will help. I need to look at screens for over 8 hours a day, 2 screens at work and im a gamer at home.
1) drop the crt if your using one. i cant even look at one now for over 1/2 hour now
2) keep your screen al least at arms length away.
remember even with lcd, selection of the bigger screen the harder on the eyes.
pick the largest size of a comfortable range with the smallest native resolition.
some lde pixels are way too small , a good size is 22" wide 1600x1050.
monitor brightness -- thats where it's at.. You need something that can tone down its bright whites without compromising overall color. Contrast just dont cut it.
turn off any color enhancement features as they hurt too. All these features are signs of an extra bright monitor. The worse monitor i ever owned i called it the eyebleeder.. HP 24" widescreen. cd400 brightness is a big no no for eye eyestrain. cd300 is ok. 250 is prefered if you can find them.
Bleeding of light is another indicator of a screen that is too bright. If you place up a black screen and see loads of light around the edges then it could cause problems. THe best i have seen for no bleeding is Dell. I can stare at 2 of them all day ar work with no issues. there is 0 light bleeding on my work screens. I just turn the brightness down some and it's cuts out the extra bright white intensity.
Another note.. If you find any monitor that you can turn the brightness down to 0 and it's still bright! well that should speak for itself! skip that complete model line for your choice.
Now for monitor settings. ATI has some nice features for this . you can set desktop and 3d enviroment seperatly.
In the color settings, you can select a feature call saturation.. its kinda like the same color enhancment feature monitor provides. if your color seems a bit too cartoon like. Open up a personal outdoor photo and adjust so it looks "real" not extra nice and bright.
Gamma can also be toned up afterwards if you find some of the blacks are now too dark. this is found under color settings also. contrast adjust normally.
The last thing i can think of is font and remember ever bit counts. You need to use true type font on an lcd , this is great for reducing eyestrain. Do whatever you can to keep your font clear. ALWAYS run your LCD in native resolution, any less will cause pixel blending over the additional pixels ( blurred text ). this is very important.
For me Dell and Samsung are the best. Dell is by far most superior in ever way for reducing strain. ( i never tried the new 23 + screens but plann to ) possible they may be a bit bright also. Dell is the only monitor that clearly had no light bleeding out around the edges up to there 22" That will be my next test is i ever decide to go 23" + i have to weigh in the fact tho that the 23" has extra small pixels tho well. wither way. I wrote this hoping to help everyone with this. There was and still times i strain my eyes so bad i cant even looks at tail lights at the car in front of me when following another car to work.. yeah.. its that bad. Today I manage my eyes to be able to play games for a few extra hours a day.. anyway.. Good luck to you all.
Something I have stumbled across that no one seems to mention.
LCD monitor have flourescent light tubes behind them, which emit UV light (they're desgned to do that becasue the Phospor inside the tubes reacts with UV light to produce white light)
UV light is no good for the eyes as we are lolt by pretty much everyone.
CRT's however use electron beams to give u picture....
Just a thought...
6 of one, half a dozen of the other at the end of the day. Monitors in general are bad for your eyes. But just maybe CRT's are better in the long run...I've been using an LCD monitor for 2 years, and have noticed a serious deterioration in my eyes since I have started using them. Where as before that I used a CRT for probabaly 10 years or more.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.