Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (
More info?)
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:53:35 -0700, "Timothy Daniels"
<TDaniels@NoSpamDot.com> wrote:
>"_R" wrote:
>>I know that anything from Dr Nortenstein's labs must be a multiheaded
>> monster, but aside from that, what are the general tradeoffs between
>> current versions of Norton Ghost and the Acronis tools suite?
>
> I have a very narrow use, but for that, Acronis doesn't suffice.
>All I want to do is to archive bootable clones of my system
>partition on a large capacity archival internal IDE hard drive.
>Acronis True Image will take the entire suface of the source
>drive and copy it to the entire surface of the destination drive.
>This is great for migrating an OS from a small HD to a larger HD -
>the usual vanilla use for a cloning utility. But I want to select JUST
>a SINGLE partition from a source HD and transfer it to unallocated
>space on a destination HD where it will be among OTHER similar
>clones.
So far, Acronis will do this.
> And they all have to be immediately bootable - none of this
>"image restore" step from an image file.
If you're referring to booting the image itself (as opposed to
restoring it first) then I'm not sure that Acronis can do it. Just
curious about why you'd want to do that as it sounds like it would be
very slow.
> Ghost will do this - when
>it's working. Right now, though, it frrezes my PC as it begins the
>copy step.
Well, now I'm sold! <g>
> So, I plan to try Casper XP since their tech rep says
>that it will do what I want.
>
>*TimDaniels*
I hope Casper works as planned. Norton and Acronis could use some
competition (I guess there's BootIt Ng as well). Please report back
on whether Casper works out.
I didn't want to tilt my original question with my own opinion, but
I've had much the same experience as many in this thread. I've found
Norton to be too cumbersome. Acronis, on the other hand, seems to
require a few different packages to get the same range of
functionality.
I've also found that Acronis's MigrateEasy, while sounding like a
nice, simple tool, doesn't seem to work at all. Of course their
imager seems to resize partitions on restore now, so the bases are
covered there.
One other thing that was discussed here: Can Acronis restore an
individual file from an image? I haven't had occasion to do this, but
from the menu it appears as if it can. I guess one of the followups
narrowed this to 'restore a locked system file while XP is running.'
That may be a bit different. Again, I'm trying to imagine why that
would be a major requirement, but I guess there are scenarios...
In any event, that sounds like it may be tough to synchronize, and I
would not be surprised to see Ghost crash if the wrong file is chosen.
Re the above: I've occasionally used 'unlocker' (URL on request...I
don't have it handy) to unlock and delete a file that was locked by
XP. It would seem like you could replace it, with the provision that
XP knows to look for it after it's unlocked (Unlocker may stop a
process). Still, I can't think of where I would apply that.