Tom's Hardware Forums » Systems » Compaq » Apple Vs. IBM PC's
 

Apple Vs. IBM PC's




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Apple Vs. IBM PC's
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Any one have any good reasons why some one should buy a Apple Computer over a IBM compatible PC

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

not really. if you want ease of use, go with apple. if you want customizability, go with a PC. also they are no longer IBM compatible, because of the way that they are designed. IBM compatible was a big thing in the days of DOS and windows 3.1 because DOS and 3.1 needed a computer that had the same design as the IBM systems. Nowadays they are no longer called IBM compatible (even though they technically still are) because Microsoft's operating systems do not need a system that is Structurally compareable to the IBM systems. It does need X86 architecture though.


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Systems » Compaq » Apple Vs. IBM PC's

Go to:
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

Apple Developers Conference Sold Out

Published on May 15, 2008

San Francisco (CA) - People are salivating over rumors of the new Apple iPhone and have purchased tickets to the upcoming Apple Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in droves. Read more

Users report Apple iMac video glitch

Published on February 10, 2006

Apple is following-up reports that its new Intel-based iMacs are experiencing video problems preventing the full display of some graphics. Read more

Apple releases Aperture 1.1

Published on April 13, 2006

Universal version of company's professional photography software delivers improved RAW quality, better performance, and a new lower price. Read more

Apple releases Mac OS X 10.4.3

Published on November 01, 2005

Apple on Monday released an update for Mac OS X, bringing both the client and server versions of the operating system to 10.4.3. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

System Builder Marathon: The $4,500 Super PC

Published on October 28, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon spreads the system prices out even further to $4,500, $1,500, and $500. Is today’s $4,500 system really worth three times as much as an upper-mainstream performance machine? Read more

Can Your Old Athlon 64 Still Game?

Published on October 24, 2008

We'd all love to upgrade every time a new piece of gaming hardware drops, but that's an expensive proposition. You think your Athlon 64 system is fairly quick--any chance a simple graphics upgrade can bring it up speed? We're aiming to find out. Read more

Benchmarking With Intel's NAS Toolkit

Published on October 23, 2008

We've been publishing our networked storage stories using Intel's NAS Performance tool kit as our primary benchmark. But before we went any further, we thought we'd introduce the software package and its individual components. Read more