22" LCD - Best monitor?

Forum Computer Peripherals : Flat Panels/ LCDs - 22" LCD - Best monitor?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Hi,

I'm looking to buy a new monitor for my PC. I don't really want to spend more than £250, but my maximum budget is £350. I've been looking at the following two and would like some advice.

http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/Pro [...] tID=604046

http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/Pro [...] tID=608174

I would like it to be at least 22". I will use it for gaming, photo editing and watching movies mostly. Is the lower brightness going to make a big difference in the first i linked to, or does the refresh rate make up for it? Another thing, I've been reading about the TN panel technology and wasn't sure whether these screens used it. Any help is appreciated.

Thanks.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

If your gaming 5ms is a bit choppy. However, your eye adjusts quickly and you get the 2" larger screen.
The only real issue I've personally run into with the flat screens is not seeing dark blue on a black back ground.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by foste on 12-10-2007 at 11:15:54 PM
Reply to foste

foste wrote :


The only real issue I've personally run into with the flat screens is not seeing dark blue on a black back ground.




That's mainly due to the cheap but inexpensive TN panel technology. All inexpensive LCD monitors use TN panels. The only 22" LCD monitor that does not use an "inferior" TN panel is the Lenovo L220x which uses a S-PVA panel and is about $450.

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP

Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx

Firstly, thanks for the replies.
I've had a look at that screen jaguarskx and it looks very good. However, I haven't been able to find it for sale at the price you said in the UK. The cheapest I have seen it for is £300, roughly $600. Also, some reviews have not rated the screen very highly. Would you agree? Also, does the fact that it uses a S-PVA panel make a big difference? I'm assuming that it is worth the extra money.

Thanks.

Reply to fatjakep

fatjakep wrote :

Firstly, thanks for the replies.
I've had a look at that screen jaguarskx and it looks very good. However, I haven't been able to find it for sale at the price you said in the UK. The cheapest I have seen it for is £300, roughly $600.



Yeah, well the US dollar has taken a pounding in international currency. For a short period of time the Canadian dollar was worth more than the US dollar. You need to compare the price by using local currency. How many £ more is it than say the Samsung 226BW?

The monitor is very new and no reviews have surfaced yet.

S-PVA panels are based on 8-bit color technology. That means it can actually produce 16.7 million colors.

TN panels are based on 6-bit color technology. That means it can actually produce 262k colors and through the "dithering" process, it can estimate the remaining 16+ million colors.

--------------

TN Pros:
-Inexpensive
-Fast response times

TN Cons:
-Poor color accuracy
-Poor viewing angles
-Poor black levels
-Poor contrast ratios

S-PVA / M-PVA Pros:
-Very good color accuracy
-Good viewing angles
-Good black levels
-Good contrast ratios

S-PVA / M-PVA Cons:
-Little more expensive
-Slightly slower response times (about 3ms - 5ms slower depending on the model)

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP

Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx

The prices are as follows:

Samsung 226BW £205.50
Samsung 245B £305.37
Lenovo L220X £305.25

Both of the Samsungs here still use a TN panel and so the Lenovo still comes out on top for me. However, I think i will have to wait for reviews because i don't want to be spending that £100 extra if I'm not sure how it will perform.

Thanks a lot for the help.

Reply to fatjakep

The Lenovo L220X is far superior to the Samsungs because of the TN/S-PVA differences already pointed out.

Hound

Reply to thegodlikeone

Beware of the 226BW quality. It's a great deal and looks fantastic but I've now returned 2 of these. One developed a vertical yellow line of dead/bad pixels after 2 weeks of use and the one I exchanged it for had terrible blue hue to it which I could not adjust so I've now gotten my 3rd in 5weeks and it seems ok but I've got my fingers crossed. Samsung has changed their stickers and service menu now so buyers can't easily distinguish which A,C,S manufacturer your getting. If you buy this monitor make sure your place of purchase offers in store returns for a lengthy period of time as that will save you alot in RMA return costs and samsung themselves will only return you a factory refurbished one. Samsungs name is pretty much dirt to me now and if this 3rd monitor dies on me I'll just return it and get an Acer. Thank god I didn't buy this over the net.

Reply to Alwaysrun
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Computer Peripherals > Flat Panels/ LCDs > 22" LCD - Best monitor?
Go to:

There are 866 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them