Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (
More info?)
Ken thanks for taking the time on your great reply. That is all that I was
asking for. This is a valuable opinion from someone who has obviously earned
the right of Microsoft MVP as opposed to newsgroup troll trash.
What makes the internet great is the converstations that this great
invention enables. Those conversations break down when you become offensive.
Kurt, I checked out your website and read your blog. You seem like a great
guy, I just wish we could tone down our little spat and have a reasonable
discussion on this.
Maybe we could post our opinions on our blogs and discuss this in comments.
In any case I will go ahead and apologize for hijacking this thread and for
my ranting. I was angry that someone attacked me and posted profanities on
my website over such a silly thing and almost immediately after I got more
grief in this thread. That does not make for a friendly support environment.
As a side note Kurt you are right. I have not participated in many public
newsgroups because when I was doing support we used the internal MS Knowledge
Base which is a gold mine of information. If you could not find an answer
there, good luck. Also about the time that I started doing support we had
Google groups to help us out. When Google newsgroup search hit the scenes we
had a great way of searching newsgroups without having to subscribe to them.
This is what got me started on using a web interface to access news groups.
I have also been using web based clients for email for as long as I have been
using email. IMO web based interfaces are the future and I use them whenever
possible. I would even go further to say that I would like to see the day
where my computer can be a thin client to an online subscription based OS.
I will go ahead and setup my access to the newsgroup in OE. Thanks again
for the great reply Ken.
--
http://www.americantechie.com
"Ken Blake" wrote:
> In news:355192D8-157C-4806-9A79-8CA1CA8D1F2F@microsoft.com,
> AmericanTechie <AmericanTechie@discussions.microsoft.com> typed:
>
> > I second that, SP2 is must and is not the root of the problem.
> >
> > I have a question that is a little off topic. What is the
> > problem
> > with the CDO method of posting? Why do people have a problem
> > with
> > users posting this way?
>
>
> Speaking for myself, I don't have a problem with your
> participating in the newsgroup any way you want to. But as far as
> I'm concerned, it's the slowest, clunkiest, most error-prone
> method there is, and you handicap yourself by doing so. Do
> yourself a favor and switch to a newsreader, such as Outlook
> Express, which comes with Windows.
> See
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/outlookexpressnewreader.htm
>
> Many people who use CDO have trouble finding replies to their
> messages. It's slow because it gets messages one at a time,
> instead of all at once the way a newsreader would. It doesn't
> have the filtering, organizing, and spell-checking facilities
> that a newsreader has.
>
>
> > Someone who I guess was about 12 in Canada
> > left a belligerant comment on my website because I posted my
> > replies
> > using CDO. I use web interfaces for as many apps as I can.
>
>
> Your choice of course, but I strongly recommend that you try a
> newsreader instead. It will make your life much easier.
>
>
> > Also how
> > can you tell that I am using the web interface?
>
>
> It's in the header of your message: X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO
> for Windows 2000
>
> --
> Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> Please reply to the newsgroup
>
>
>