Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > Windows XP General Discussion > Windows says CPU speed is slower than it really is...

Windows says CPU speed is slower than it really is...

Forum Windows XP : Windows XP General Discussion - Windows says CPU speed is slower than it really is...

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

My friend has an AMD 2500+ CPU which runs at 1.83ghz. Just like it should,
the System Properties General tab used to say it was operating at 1.83ghz.
He just recently reinstalled Windows XP Home edition and now his System
properties say the CPU is operating at 1.1ghz. He also installed one of
those programs that monitors the system temperatures and stuff and it says
1.1ghz also. How would something like this happen and would he need to
reinstall Windows XP again?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

It sounds like the FSB speed is not set properly in the bios (or it is not
jumpered correctly)

It should be set to 166 (double pumped to 333) as 11*166 = roughly 1.83 ghz.
You probably have it set to 100 now (11*100=1.1 ghz)

--
Gary Tsang
Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
http://www.microsoft.com/mvp


"djtoner" <djtoner@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7F32C3B1-6EEB-4362-AA27-55A962FCBD21@microsoft.com...
> My friend has an AMD 2500+ CPU which runs at 1.83ghz. Just like it
> should,
> the System Properties General tab used to say it was operating at 1.83ghz.
> He just recently reinstalled Windows XP Home edition and now his System
> properties say the CPU is operating at 1.1ghz. He also installed one of
> those programs that monitors the system temperatures and stuff and it says
> 1.1ghz also. How would something like this happen and would he need to
> reinstall Windows XP again?

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

BTW, you only need to make the change in the bios (or jumper settings). You
won't need to reinstall Windows for this.

Consult your motherboard's manual for exact instructions as to how to do
this.

Hope this helps.

--
Gary Tsang
Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
http://www.microsoft.com/mvp


"Gary Tsang" <gtsangDELETE@MEaumha.org> wrote in message
news:%23Fbsxq1iFHA.2668@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> It sounds like the FSB speed is not set properly in the bios (or it is not
> jumpered correctly)
>
> It should be set to 166 (double pumped to 333) as 11*166 = roughly 1.83
> ghz. You probably have it set to 100 now (11*100=1.1 ghz)
>
> --
> Gary Tsang
> Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
> http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
>
>
> "djtoner" <djtoner@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:7F32C3B1-6EEB-4362-AA27-55A962FCBD21@microsoft.com...
>> My friend has an AMD 2500+ CPU which runs at 1.83ghz. Just like it
>> should,
>> the System Properties General tab used to say it was operating at
>> 1.83ghz.
>> He just recently reinstalled Windows XP Home edition and now his System
>> properties say the CPU is operating at 1.1ghz. He also installed one of
>> those programs that monitors the system temperatures and stuff and it
>> says
>> 1.1ghz also. How would something like this happen and would he need to
>> reinstall Windows XP again?
>
>

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

How interesting, Gary. Sounds as though nothing was changed by the user
other than a reinstall? BTW, shouldn't you be playing tennis somewhere or
is that your brother? <w>

--

All the Best,
Kelly (MS-MVP)

Troubleshooting Windows XP
http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com



"Gary Tsang" <gtsangDELETE@MEaumha.org> wrote in message
news:%23Fbsxq1iFHA.2668@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> It sounds like the FSB speed is not set properly in the bios (or it is not
> jumpered correctly)
>
> It should be set to 166 (double pumped to 333) as 11*166 = roughly 1.83
> ghz. You probably have it set to 100 now (11*100=1.1 ghz)
>
> --
> Gary Tsang
> Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
> http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
>
>
> "djtoner" <djtoner@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:7F32C3B1-6EEB-4362-AA27-55A962FCBD21@microsoft.com...
>> My friend has an AMD 2500+ CPU which runs at 1.83ghz. Just like it
>> should,
>> the System Properties General tab used to say it was operating at
>> 1.83ghz.
>> He just recently reinstalled Windows XP Home edition and now his System
>> properties say the CPU is operating at 1.1ghz. He also installed one of
>> those programs that monitors the system temperatures and stuff and it
>> says
>> 1.1ghz also. How would something like this happen and would he need to
>> reinstall Windows XP again?
>
>

Reply to kelly

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

That was a few hours ago heh (with my brother). Given that it's pitch black
right now, I doubt anyone is playing tennis (plus the fact that it is
raining).

It's definitely the FSB being set wrong. Assuming it is a relatively recent
motherboard that is software fsb controlled, something definitely caused the
FSB to change... perhaps his computer crashed and his bios set the FSB to a
failsafe frequency...

--
Gary Tsang
Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
http://www.microsoft.com/mvp


"Kelly" <kelly@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:%23aQxNx1iFHA.3692@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> How interesting, Gary. Sounds as though nothing was changed by the user
> other than a reinstall? BTW, shouldn't you be playing tennis somewhere or
> is that your brother? <w>
>
> --
>
> All the Best,
> Kelly (MS-MVP)
>
> Troubleshooting Windows XP
> http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com
>
>
>
> "Gary Tsang" <gtsangDELETE@MEaumha.org> wrote in message
> news:%23Fbsxq1iFHA.2668@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> It sounds like the FSB speed is not set properly in the bios (or it is
>> not jumpered correctly)
>>
>> It should be set to 166 (double pumped to 333) as 11*166 = roughly 1.83
>> ghz. You probably have it set to 100 now (11*100=1.1 ghz)
>>
>> --
>> Gary Tsang
>> Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
>> http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
>>
>>
>> "djtoner" <djtoner@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:7F32C3B1-6EEB-4362-AA27-55A962FCBD21@microsoft.com...
>>> My friend has an AMD 2500+ CPU which runs at 1.83ghz. Just like it
>>> should,
>>> the System Properties General tab used to say it was operating at
>>> 1.83ghz.
>>> He just recently reinstalled Windows XP Home edition and now his System
>>> properties say the CPU is operating at 1.1ghz. He also installed one of
>>> those programs that monitors the system temperatures and stuff and it
>>> says
>>> 1.1ghz also. How would something like this happen and would he need to
>>> reinstall Windows XP again?
>>
>>
>
>

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

<LOL> Glad to hear it and thanks for the feedback, Gary. However, love the
dark and rain. Ever noticed the hours I work? :o)

As per the latter, will be reading with interest.

--

All the Best,
Kelly (MS-MVP)

Troubleshooting Windows XP
http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com



"Gary Tsang" <gtsangDELETE@MEaumha.org> wrote in message
news:e$FP9M2iFHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> That was a few hours ago heh (with my brother). Given that it's pitch
> black right now, I doubt anyone is playing tennis (plus the fact that it
> is raining).
>
> It's definitely the FSB being set wrong. Assuming it is a relatively
> recent motherboard that is software fsb controlled, something definitely
> caused the FSB to change... perhaps his computer crashed and his bios set
> the FSB to a failsafe frequency...
>
> --
> Gary Tsang
> Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
> http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
>
>
> "Kelly" <kelly@mvps.org> wrote in message
> news:%23aQxNx1iFHA.3692@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> How interesting, Gary. Sounds as though nothing was changed by the user
>> other than a reinstall? BTW, shouldn't you be playing tennis somewhere
>> or is that your brother? <w>
>>
>> --
>>
>> All the Best,
>> Kelly (MS-MVP)
>>
>> Troubleshooting Windows XP
>> http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com
>>
>>
>>
>> "Gary Tsang" <gtsangDELETE@MEaumha.org> wrote in message
>> news:%23Fbsxq1iFHA.2668@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>> It sounds like the FSB speed is not set properly in the bios (or it is
>>> not jumpered correctly)
>>>
>>> It should be set to 166 (double pumped to 333) as 11*166 = roughly 1.83
>>> ghz. You probably have it set to 100 now (11*100=1.1 ghz)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gary Tsang
>>> Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
>>>
>>>
>>> "djtoner" <djtoner@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>> news:7F32C3B1-6EEB-4362-AA27-55A962FCBD21@microsoft.com...
>>>> My friend has an AMD 2500+ CPU which runs at 1.83ghz. Just like it
>>>> should,
>>>> the System Properties General tab used to say it was operating at
>>>> 1.83ghz.
>>>> He just recently reinstalled Windows XP Home edition and now his System
>>>> properties say the CPU is operating at 1.1ghz. He also installed one
>>>> of
>>>> those programs that monitors the system temperatures and stuff and it
>>>> says
>>>> 1.1ghz also. How would something like this happen and would he need to
>>>> reinstall Windows XP again?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply to kelly

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

Yeah, I didn't even think of that. The guy whose computer this is had one of
his other friends put a new HD in and that's what they installed WinXP on. I
don't think the guy knew to check the BIOS settings though.
Although, a new HD isn't going to mess with the BIOS settings for the CPU I
don't think. I'll have him check it out.
Thanks!

"Gary Tsang" wrote:

> That was a few hours ago heh (with my brother). Given that it's pitch black
> right now, I doubt anyone is playing tennis (plus the fact that it is
> raining).
>
> It's definitely the FSB being set wrong. Assuming it is a relatively recent
> motherboard that is software fsb controlled, something definitely caused the
> FSB to change... perhaps his computer crashed and his bios set the FSB to a
> failsafe frequency...
>
> --
> Gary Tsang
> Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
> http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
>
>
> "Kelly" <kelly@mvps.org> wrote in message
> news:%23aQxNx1iFHA.3692@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > How interesting, Gary. Sounds as though nothing was changed by the user
> > other than a reinstall? BTW, shouldn't you be playing tennis somewhere or
> > is that your brother? <w>
> >
> > --
> >
> > All the Best,
> > Kelly (MS-MVP)
> >
> > Troubleshooting Windows XP
> > http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com
> >
> >
> >
> > "Gary Tsang" <gtsangDELETE@MEaumha.org> wrote in message
> > news:%23Fbsxq1iFHA.2668@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> It sounds like the FSB speed is not set properly in the bios (or it is
> >> not jumpered correctly)
> >>
> >> It should be set to 166 (double pumped to 333) as 11*166 = roughly 1.83
> >> ghz. You probably have it set to 100 now (11*100=1.1 ghz)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Gary Tsang
> >> Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
> >> http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> >>
> >>
> >> "djtoner" <djtoner@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:7F32C3B1-6EEB-4362-AA27-55A962FCBD21@microsoft.com...
> >>> My friend has an AMD 2500+ CPU which runs at 1.83ghz. Just like it
> >>> should,
> >>> the System Properties General tab used to say it was operating at
> >>> 1.83ghz.
> >>> He just recently reinstalled Windows XP Home edition and now his System
> >>> properties say the CPU is operating at 1.1ghz. He also installed one of
> >>> those programs that monitors the system temperatures and stuff and it
> >>> says
> >>> 1.1ghz also. How would something like this happen and would he need to
> >>> reinstall Windows XP again?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

If the installer initially set the jumpers pins where you have double slaves
for instance, the PC may have refused to even shown video at turnon.
The failsafe settings may have been invoked afterwards on the next turnon
attempt. No one has to enter the bios settings for this to happen.

"djtoner" <djtoner@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:26FCA6C8-F11E-4954-ACB1-BD8927EBC50D@microsoft.com...
> Yeah, I didn't even think of that. The guy whose computer this is had one
of
> his other friends put a new HD in and that's what they installed WinXP on.
I
> don't think the guy knew to check the BIOS settings though.
> Although, a new HD isn't going to mess with the BIOS settings for the CPU
I
> don't think. I'll have him check it out.
> Thanks!
>
> "Gary Tsang" wrote:
>
> > That was a few hours ago heh (with my brother). Given that it's pitch
black
> > right now, I doubt anyone is playing tennis (plus the fact that it is
> > raining).
> >
> > It's definitely the FSB being set wrong. Assuming it is a relatively
recent
> > motherboard that is software fsb controlled, something definitely caused
the
> > FSB to change... perhaps his computer crashed and his bios set the FSB
to a
> > failsafe frequency...
> >
> > --
> > Gary Tsang
> > Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
> > http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> >
> >
> > "Kelly" <kelly@mvps.org> wrote in message
> > news:%23aQxNx1iFHA.3692@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > How interesting, Gary. Sounds as though nothing was changed by the
user
> > > other than a reinstall? BTW, shouldn't you be playing tennis
somewhere or
> > > is that your brother? <w>
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > All the Best,
> > > Kelly (MS-MVP)
> > >
> > > Troubleshooting Windows XP
> > > http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Gary Tsang" <gtsangDELETE@MEaumha.org> wrote in message
> > > news:%23Fbsxq1iFHA.2668@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > >> It sounds like the FSB speed is not set properly in the bios (or it
is
> > >> not jumpered correctly)
> > >>
> > >> It should be set to 166 (double pumped to 333) as 11*166 = roughly
1.83
> > >> ghz. You probably have it set to 100 now (11*100=1.1 ghz)
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Gary Tsang
> > >> Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
> > >> http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> "djtoner" <djtoner@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > >> news:7F32C3B1-6EEB-4362-AA27-55A962FCBD21@microsoft.com...
> > >>> My friend has an AMD 2500+ CPU which runs at 1.83ghz. Just like it
> > >>> should,
> > >>> the System Properties General tab used to say it was operating at
> > >>> 1.83ghz.
> > >>> He just recently reinstalled Windows XP Home edition and now his
System
> > >>> properties say the CPU is operating at 1.1ghz. He also installed
one of
> > >>> those programs that monitors the system temperatures and stuff and
it
> > >>> says
> > >>> 1.1ghz also. How would something like this happen and would he need
to
> > >>> reinstall Windows XP again?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

Did you install the AMD "Cool and Quiet" drivers? They can do this...

Reply to frodo

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

 

Ah yes. Forgot about that.

Yes, that's another area where the FSB speed can be controlled.
Since Windows takes the actual FSB at the time of the opening of the System
Control Panel...

cool and Quiet can be disabled in the bios, or can be turned off in Windows
by selecting an appropriate power profile in the Power Options Control
Panel. Always On & Home/Office Desk will disable the Cool and Quiet
feature.

Just started playing with that feature on my brother's new computer. It's
pretty cool (pardon the pun).

--
Gary Tsang
Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Shell/User
http://www.microsoft.com/mvp


<frodo@theshire.org> wrote in message
news:11dnu54bl6ptefa@corp.supernews.com...
> Did you install the AMD "Cool and Quiet" drivers? They can do this...
>

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > Windows XP General Discussion > Windows says CPU speed is slower than it really is...
Go to:

There are 944 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 skythra won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 Ckaz won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 james59 won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 snarl won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 patlabor44 won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 Kiren won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 WookinPaNub won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 kwadams won the Uniformed badge
  • 21:57 brockh won the Sophmore badge
  • 01:00 xpax won the Freshman badge