Hi,
I just found an Hitachi Deskstar for $70 AR, the catch is that it ATA 100. I have a 1 yr old system (my boot drive is SATA) so it's capable of a lot more, but if I splurge for a SATA150 it'll cost about twice as much. I was wondering just how much of a performance hit I would suffer. I'll be using the new drive mostly for transfering, editing and mpeg encoding very large video files ~80GB (from miniDV tapes).
The ATA 100 is a 250GB drive, my main concern is that it's a 40pin IDE so will I be forced to partition the drive (I read sth in the sticky that above 137GB isnt recognized???) I dunno if it has NCQ - probably not eh? I'm confused since the first of the HDD FAQ's said that there's no performance difference between the ATA100 and ATA133 and I read that there isnt much difference between the 133 and the SATA150, so what's your take on it?
I just found an Hitachi Deskstar for $70 AR, the catch is that it ATA 100. I have a 1 yr old system (my boot drive is SATA) so it's capable of a lot more, but if I splurge for a SATA150 it'll cost about twice as much. I was wondering just how much of a performance hit I would suffer. I'll be using the new drive mostly for transfering, editing and mpeg encoding very large video files ~80GB (from miniDV tapes).
The ATA 100 is a 250GB drive, my main concern is that it's a 40pin IDE so will I be forced to partition the drive (I read sth in the sticky that above 137GB isnt recognized???) I dunno if it has NCQ - probably not eh? I'm confused since the first of the HDD FAQ's said that there's no performance difference between the ATA100 and ATA133 and I read that there isnt much difference between the 133 and the SATA150, so what's your take on it?