someone told me before that response time effects how fast you see an object come onto the screen. Example, LCD-A(25ms response time) versus LCD-B(2ms response time), while playing a FPS. LCD-B having a better response time, it would see the enemies/objects come onto the screen quicker. Thus, LCD-B would have an advantage because you would get to see your enemy quicker.
Is this true?
Thx!
Message edited by kingfood on 11-21-2008 at 08:51:04 AM
Response time means how long it takes for the pixel to change from one color to another. The more substantial impact is ghosting or trailing images.
Monitors are generally rated between 2ms - 8ms. There are a couple of 30" LCD monitors with 12ms response times. But those response times under ideal conditions. Actual response times can be as high as 40ms depending on what is being displayed.
What most hardcore gamers are concerned about is input lag. All monitors have some level of input lag typically ranging from 12ms to as high as 50ms. This is the delay between when the image is being rendered by the GPU and when the image is displayed on the screen.
Message edited by jaguarskx on 11-21-2008 at 06:12:13 PM
------------------------------Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP
Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx
Wow I never knew about this "output" lag.. I think that is what I'm referring to. Now I read that overdrive panels have more output lag and I just ordered one! I much rather have ghosting than output lag. I want to see my enemies the same time they see me...
Basically all LCD monitors uses a form of overdrive which is why most have response times rated between 2ms and 8ms. Without overdrive response times would be higher.
I've read that there have been a few LCD monitors where overdrive actually increases (make worse) ghosting effects. Whether it is due to poor implementation and/or poor manufacturing standards, I am not sure.
------------------------------Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP
Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx
hmmm after doing some more research, it seems like response time is not really related to input lag. For example, the Dell E228WFP has a response time of 5ms while the Iiyama B2403WS has a response time of 3ms. The Dell E228WFP actually has less input lag at 3.2ms versus the Iiyama B2403WS at 23.5ms!
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.