Over the last year I have read countless post about the Western Digital Raptor HD. Time and time again I have read how much faster they are compared to any other HD in the same class. Ive even asked the question of which would be the fastest, One WD raptor or 2 "Take your pick" HDs in RAID1. Ive been told over and over that the single raptor would outperform the SATA1 config of any other brands on the market including some of Western Digitals HDs. Im not finding this to be true. Maybe I got a bad Raptor but I really doubt that. Ive run SiSandra and the PCMark 04 and 05 HD test and the SATA1 config beats the RAPTOR. The RAID1 consist of 2 Maxtor 120G 8MB CASHE 7200 RPM SATA drives.
Anyone care to comment? If im missing something please point it out. Im having a really hard time understanding where the price/performance of paying for 1 or 2 raptors makes since.
ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz
<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
Anyone care to comment? If im missing something please point it out. Im having a really hard time understanding where the price/performance of paying for 1 or 2 raptors makes since.
ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz
<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs