It’s really a hypothetical question since I know that more and faster is almost always better. For example, once I doubled my existing memory and experienced a significant increase in performance when playing 3D-games, but according to the discussion about cache above, it should not have been possible…should it? But that is not what I would like to bring up now.
Should one get faster or more memory, or should one maybe don’t care about the memory issue at all?
I was just thinking about the potential (almost none existing) gain in speed that should be the result of a memory upgrade. The reason for my thinking is the fact that the cache memory often has a hit ratio of over 90%. Doesn’t that mean that the speed and size of the RAM only come into play every 10th time the processor needs some info. Hence when more or faster (and of course more expensive) memory is bought it is only beneficial to the user in 10% of the cases.
Right or wrong?
Should one get faster or more memory, or should one maybe don’t care about the memory issue at all?
I was just thinking about the potential (almost none existing) gain in speed that should be the result of a memory upgrade. The reason for my thinking is the fact that the cache memory often has a hit ratio of over 90%. Doesn’t that mean that the speed and size of the RAM only come into play every 10th time the processor needs some info. Hence when more or faster (and of course more expensive) memory is bought it is only beneficial to the user in 10% of the cases.
Right or wrong?