For a while now i've been leaning very heavily towards drives that indicate MTBF ratings. I'd rather spend a little more money up front for the security of having my data safe. That was part of my rationale for my last Seagate Barracuda purchase.
Now that i'm looking for a new SATA drive, i'm checking out the competition a bit. I'm seeing good things regarding some Hitachi and Samsung drives, but i'm not willing to sacrifice performance for security. I haven't been able to find any MTBF ratings for the Hitachi drives. Is there a general concensus that MTBF is a pretty good indication of reliability?
Anyway, i get the feeling that a lot of people here lean towards Seagate also, perhaps for the same reasons. Perhaps i should just go with the old standby
Thanks!
PS Do the new Seagate Barracude SATA drives use fluid dynamic bearings?
PPS I guess everyone's had a bad experience, but i had a Maxtor drive fail on me like 10 years ago and i haven't forgiven them since!
Now that i'm looking for a new SATA drive, i'm checking out the competition a bit. I'm seeing good things regarding some Hitachi and Samsung drives, but i'm not willing to sacrifice performance for security. I haven't been able to find any MTBF ratings for the Hitachi drives. Is there a general concensus that MTBF is a pretty good indication of reliability?
Anyway, i get the feeling that a lot of people here lean towards Seagate also, perhaps for the same reasons. Perhaps i should just go with the old standby
Thanks!
PS Do the new Seagate Barracude SATA drives use fluid dynamic bearings?
PPS I guess everyone's had a bad experience, but i had a Maxtor drive fail on me like 10 years ago and i haven't forgiven them since!