Archived from groups: rec.games.miniatures.warhammer (
More info?)
In article <slrnd5kbib.u12.nouser@crux.id.gu.se>, jockelinde,
nouser@notmydomain.se Varfed out the following in Timo speak...
> Raveners:
>
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakka/Default.aspx?tabid=27&g=posts&t=5492
I really like the new body style, but the limbs don't much appeal
to me. I like the 'Red Terror' feel to it with 6 limbs (gee - now like
the other nids who predominately have 6 limbs). I don't know why GW
feels it has to keep reinventing the wheel - to my taste, this model
would look better if they used the large talons from the monstrous
creatures sprue for the upper set, the medium talons from the plastic
warriors for the middle set, and gaunt talons for the lowest set. Ah
well, leave it to GW to create yet another model where the body is now
more consistant with the main Nid style, but the limbs are less
consistant.
>
> Tyrant guard:
>
http://uk.games-workshop.com/sneakpeeks/warhammer40000/default.htm
>
I still loathe this model. The concept has potential, but the
final result falls far short. If they'd have made it so that the
model's legs and fore-limbs were as bulked out as the middle limbs, and
given it a more up-right pose, I could buy it as a bullet shield for
monstrous creatures, but these things are only going to cover a tyrant's
legs. Dumb. Between that and the lose of the rending claw, lash-whip,
and spine fist options this thing just gets LESS appealing by the
minute.
Myrmidon
--
#1582. I think they call it Warhammer "40K" because that is how
much you are going to have to make per year in order to play.
- Eric Noland
# 1082. Pound for pound I can buy cocaine cheaper than
raise a Warhammer army
- Roy Cox
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/gwprice/
****
RGMW FAQ:
http://www.rgmw.org
Or...
http://www.sheppard.demon.co.uk/rgmw_faq/rgmw_faq.htm