G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.miniatures.warhammer (More info?)
Despite the apparent complete lack of interest in the new Wood Elves
around here (Christof aside), here are some more pictures:
http://us.games-workshop.com/download/popup.htm?/games/warhammer/woodelves/extras/preview/images/twilight_sisters.gif
No question that the Sisters are far superior to the old dragon rider;
though the 'standing on the dragon' pose isn't the best either would
make a great infantry character, and it's good that they're separate
models rather than moulded as a pair - it makes using the dragon with
just one easier. The sprites will be easy enough to leave off, since
the dragon is the same model as before, and they actually look okay - I
might use them on character bases or Treemen. As a whole: 4. For either
of the sisters (especially the one on the dragon's neck) as infantry
characters: 5.
http://us.games-workshop.com/download/popup.htm?/games/warhammer/woodelves/extras/preview/images/warhawks.gif
I said these were an improvement over the last ones when I could only
see them on the army deal cover. Now I see them better I think I'll
take that back. The Champion isn't altogether bad; shame the same can't
be said for his companions and the birds. It's just as well Warhawk
Riders look to be an unpopular choice based on the Dakka rumours; I
shouldn't imagine I'll expand my unit beyond those in the army deal.
There's an old (current) Eagle in the background - the best of the
three, but it'll be a shame if they aren't redoing that model. Verdict:
1.5 (they aren't *quite* as bad as the Treeman).
http://us.games-workshop.com/download/popup.htm?/games/warhammer/woodelves/extras/preview/images/waywatchers.gif
I still hate the champion, and the models as a whole seem a bit
cluttered, but I love some of these poses - on balance I still prefer
the old Waywatchers, but I'll be very happy to get these in the army
deal (which fortunately appears not to include the Champion). 4.
>http://us.games->workshop.com/download/popup.htm?/games/warhammer/woodelves/extras/>preview/images/spellweaver.gif
Oh, dear. Still, there are at least two other mage (Spellweaver)
variants, and both are a lot better than this. And why the completely
out-of-theme Indian Chief look? 2.
http://us.games-workshop.com/download/popup.htm?/games/warhammer/woodelves/extras/preview/images/treekin.gif
Shame - I was hoping for so much better than this. They've got the
'wooden dinosaur' heads of the Treeman and the randomly-flailing
multiple limbs do nothing at all for the models - they certanly don't
evoke the idea of a tree with multiple branches, as is presumably the
idea. It's a shame, because without these they closely resemble the old
angry shrub Dryads (which I like) - the texturing, detail and poses are
all very similar, though they're less chunky. 2.
http://us.games-workshop.com/download/popup.htm?/games/warhammer/woodelves/extras/preview/images/glade_riders.gif
Finally, I get a proper look at these models - and they're brilliant.
Whoever painted the one from the Games Day photo screwed up massively.
I'm hesitant about the horse armour, though - I was expecting it to be
a full hood to protect the head; the half-mask not only makes little
sense for the horse and makes it harder to use in non-WE ranges, the
asymmetry is less than wholly pleasing, although I don't particularly
mind half-masks on the riders or Glade Guard. 4.
http://p096.ezboard.com/fbattlegladeforumfrm1.showMessage?topicID=5970.topic
Orion's hard to make out, but he's pretty clearly better than his
predecessor (maybe I shouldn't say this after I made a similar comment
about the Warhawk Riders not so long ago...) and I like his pose. The
Treeman looks different from the other one we've seen - presumably that
was Durthu. Sadly, it's even worse. Orion: 3 Treeman: 1 (yes, it really
is as bad as its predecessor).
So, in summary:
Orion: 3
Dragon + Sisters: 4
Spellweaver: 2
Glade Riders: 4
Warhawk Riders: 1.5
Treekin: 2
Waywatchers (exc. Champion): 4 (Champion 2)
Treeman: 1
Well, this brings the range as a whole down somewhat. Fortunately a
couple of the low points - the Warhawk Riders and Treekin - look
unattractive ruleswise if the Dakka rumours are to be believed, while
the Spellweaver can be replaced by the superior Enchantress models
we've already seen. That just leaves the Treeman, who's so bad that if
I want a Treeman I'll bite the bullet and get Durthu, try and remove
the sprites and vine 'tongue' and snip off the branch in the hopes of
making a semi-acceptable model. Or maybe I'll buy Treebeard instead.
Philip Bowles
Despite the apparent complete lack of interest in the new Wood Elves
around here (Christof aside), here are some more pictures:
http://us.games-workshop.com/download/popup.htm?/games/warhammer/woodelves/extras/preview/images/twilight_sisters.gif
No question that the Sisters are far superior to the old dragon rider;
though the 'standing on the dragon' pose isn't the best either would
make a great infantry character, and it's good that they're separate
models rather than moulded as a pair - it makes using the dragon with
just one easier. The sprites will be easy enough to leave off, since
the dragon is the same model as before, and they actually look okay - I
might use them on character bases or Treemen. As a whole: 4. For either
of the sisters (especially the one on the dragon's neck) as infantry
characters: 5.
http://us.games-workshop.com/download/popup.htm?/games/warhammer/woodelves/extras/preview/images/warhawks.gif
I said these were an improvement over the last ones when I could only
see them on the army deal cover. Now I see them better I think I'll
take that back. The Champion isn't altogether bad; shame the same can't
be said for his companions and the birds. It's just as well Warhawk
Riders look to be an unpopular choice based on the Dakka rumours; I
shouldn't imagine I'll expand my unit beyond those in the army deal.
There's an old (current) Eagle in the background - the best of the
three, but it'll be a shame if they aren't redoing that model. Verdict:
1.5 (they aren't *quite* as bad as the Treeman).
http://us.games-workshop.com/download/popup.htm?/games/warhammer/woodelves/extras/preview/images/waywatchers.gif
I still hate the champion, and the models as a whole seem a bit
cluttered, but I love some of these poses - on balance I still prefer
the old Waywatchers, but I'll be very happy to get these in the army
deal (which fortunately appears not to include the Champion). 4.
>http://us.games->workshop.com/download/popup.htm?/games/warhammer/woodelves/extras/>preview/images/spellweaver.gif
Oh, dear. Still, there are at least two other mage (Spellweaver)
variants, and both are a lot better than this. And why the completely
out-of-theme Indian Chief look? 2.
http://us.games-workshop.com/download/popup.htm?/games/warhammer/woodelves/extras/preview/images/treekin.gif
Shame - I was hoping for so much better than this. They've got the
'wooden dinosaur' heads of the Treeman and the randomly-flailing
multiple limbs do nothing at all for the models - they certanly don't
evoke the idea of a tree with multiple branches, as is presumably the
idea. It's a shame, because without these they closely resemble the old
angry shrub Dryads (which I like) - the texturing, detail and poses are
all very similar, though they're less chunky. 2.
http://us.games-workshop.com/download/popup.htm?/games/warhammer/woodelves/extras/preview/images/glade_riders.gif
Finally, I get a proper look at these models - and they're brilliant.
Whoever painted the one from the Games Day photo screwed up massively.
I'm hesitant about the horse armour, though - I was expecting it to be
a full hood to protect the head; the half-mask not only makes little
sense for the horse and makes it harder to use in non-WE ranges, the
asymmetry is less than wholly pleasing, although I don't particularly
mind half-masks on the riders or Glade Guard. 4.
http://p096.ezboard.com/fbattlegladeforumfrm1.showMessage?topicID=5970.topic
Orion's hard to make out, but he's pretty clearly better than his
predecessor (maybe I shouldn't say this after I made a similar comment
about the Warhawk Riders not so long ago...) and I like his pose. The
Treeman looks different from the other one we've seen - presumably that
was Durthu. Sadly, it's even worse. Orion: 3 Treeman: 1 (yes, it really
is as bad as its predecessor).
So, in summary:
Orion: 3
Dragon + Sisters: 4
Spellweaver: 2
Glade Riders: 4
Warhawk Riders: 1.5
Treekin: 2
Waywatchers (exc. Champion): 4 (Champion 2)
Treeman: 1
Well, this brings the range as a whole down somewhat. Fortunately a
couple of the low points - the Warhawk Riders and Treekin - look
unattractive ruleswise if the Dakka rumours are to be believed, while
the Spellweaver can be replaced by the superior Enchantress models
we've already seen. That just leaves the Treeman, who's so bad that if
I want a Treeman I'll bite the bullet and get Durthu, try and remove
the sprites and vine 'tongue' and snip off the branch in the hopes of
making a semi-acceptable model. Or maybe I'll buy Treebeard instead.
Philip Bowles