Bart

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2004
112
0
18,680
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Are registry cleaners a good thing? As with anything there is usually a
price to pay for a service. I see the problem of the registry looking for
lost, deleted or moved files but if my install is sound and not much of
anything changed or moved, is it a safe thing to be doing on a regular
basis? If all is good with reg cleaners, can you recommend some good ones?

Bart
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

In news:11f7dob5vov3403@corp.supernews.com,
Bart <bsmart@nospamnet.invalid> typed:

> Are registry cleaners a good thing? As with anything there is
> usually a price to pay for a service. I see the problem of the
> registry looking for lost, deleted or moved files but if my
> install
> is sound and not much of anything changed or moved, is it a
> safe
> thing to be doing on a regular basis? If all is good with reg
> cleaners, can you recommend some good ones?


In my view, no. I recommend against all registry cleaners. They
are not needed and are far more likely to cause a problem than to
solve one.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

"Bart" <bsmart@nospamnet.invalid> wrote in message
news:11f7dob5vov3403@corp.supernews.com...
>
> Are registry cleaners a good thing? As with anything there is usually a
> price to pay for a service. I see the problem of the registry looking for
> lost, deleted or moved files but if my install is sound and not much of
> anything changed or moved, is it a safe thing to be doing on a regular
> basis? If all is good with reg cleaners, can you recommend some good
> ones?
>
> Bart
>
>

I don't recommend any. I've had to fix a lot of computers after people have
used those things. The problem is that unless you're absolutely sure you
know what you're deleting from the registry, you shouldn't do it. And if you
know what you're doing and what you want to delete, you don't need a
registry cleaner to do it for you.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Bart wrote:
>
> Are registry cleaners a good thing?


As a general rule, no. In fact, they're just the opposite. (Although
a very few decent registry cleaners, when used properly by an
experienced and knowledgeable technician, can be time savers.)


> As with anything there is usually a
> price to pay for a service. I see the problem of the registry looking for
> lost, deleted or moved files but if my install is sound and not much of
> anything changed or moved, is it a safe thing to be doing on a regular
> basis? If all is good with reg cleaners, can you recommend some good ones?
>



What specific problem are you experiencing that you *know* beyond
all reasonable doubt will be fixed by using a registry cleaner? If you
do have a problem that is rooted in the registry, it would be far better
to simply edit (after backing up, of course) only the specific key(s)
and/or value(s) that are causing the problem. Why use a shotgun when a
scalpel will do the job? Additionally, the manually changing of one or
two registry entries is far less likely to have the dire consequences of
allowing an automated product to make multiple changes simultaneously.

The registry contains all of the operating system's "knowledge" of
the computer's hardware devices, installed software, the location of the
device drivers, and the computer's configuration. A misstep in the
registry can have severe consequences. One should not even turning
loose a poorly understood automated "cleaner," unless he is fully
confident that he knows *exactly* what is going to happen as a result of
each and every change. Having seen the results of inexperienced people
using automated registry "cleaners," I can only advise all but the most
experienced computer technicians (and/or hobbyists) to avoid them all.
Experience has shown me that such tools simply are not safe in the hands
of the inexperienced user.

The only thing needed to safely clean your registry is knowledge
and Regedit.exe. If you lack the knowledge and experience to maintain
your registry by yourself, then you also lack the knowledge and
experience to safely configure and use any automated registry cleaner,
no matter how safe they claim to be.

Further, no one has ever demonstrated, to my satisfaction, that the
use of an automated registry cleaner, particularly by an untrained,
inexperienced computer user, does any real good. There's certainly been
no empirical evidence offered to demonstrate that the use of such
products to "clean" WinXP's registry improves a computer's performance
or stability.

I always use Regedit.exe. I trust my own experience and judgment
far more than I would any automated registry cleaner. I strongly
encourage others to acquire the knowledge, as well.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH
 

Bart

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2004
112
0
18,680
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Thank you all for the quick response. I suspected that the answer would be
what the general consensus is telling me. I was always a nuts and bolts guy
back in the Dos days and again with Win 3.1, Win 95, Win98, and Win ME.
However I did use a cleaner which gave me a "undoer" when I had ME. I never
found any change in performance or fewer glitches after using it. I have
edited the registry from time to time manually to resolve minor problems and
then only with explicit step by step directions. I will shun the cleaners
in favor of careful manual adjustments if needed. Thanks!

Bart
"Ken Blake" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
news:%23zyYpjfmFHA.2152@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>
> In news:11f7dob5vov3403@corp.supernews.com,
> Bart <bsmart@nospamnet.invalid> typed:
>
>> Are registry cleaners a good thing? As with anything there is
>> usually a price to pay for a service. I see the problem of the
>> registry looking for lost, deleted or moved files but if my install
>> is sound and not much of anything changed or moved, is it a safe
>> thing to be doing on a regular basis? If all is good with reg
>> cleaners, can you recommend some good ones?
>
>
> In my view, no. I recommend against all registry cleaners. They are not
> needed and are far more likely to cause a problem than to solve one.
>
> --
> Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> Please reply to the newsgroup
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

In news:11f7u5h8gact2cf@corp.supernews.com,
Bart <bsmart@nospamnet.invalid> typed:

> Thank you all for the quick response. I suspected that the
> answer
> would be what the general consensus is telling me. I was
> always a
> nuts and bolts guy back in the Dos days and again with Win 3.1,
> Win
> 95, Win98, and Win ME. However I did use a cleaner which gave
> me a
> "undoer" when I had ME. I never found any change in
> performance or
> fewer glitches after using it. I have edited the registry from
> time
> to time manually to resolve minor problems and then only with
> explicit step by step directions. I will shun the cleaners in
> favor
> of careful manual adjustments if needed. Thanks!


You're welcome. Glad to help.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup


> "Ken Blake" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
> news:%23zyYpjfmFHA.2152@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>
>> In news:11f7dob5vov3403@corp.supernews.com,
>> Bart <bsmart@nospamnet.invalid> typed:
>>
>>> Are registry cleaners a good thing? As with anything there
>>> is
>>> usually a price to pay for a service. I see the problem of
>>> the
>>> registry looking for lost, deleted or moved files but if my
>>> install
>>> is sound and not much of anything changed or moved, is it a
>>> safe
>>> thing to be doing on a regular basis? If all is good with
>>> reg
>>> cleaners, can you recommend some good ones?
>>
>>
>> In my view, no. I recommend against all registry cleaners.
>> They are
>> not needed and are far more likely to cause a problem than to
>> solve
>> one. --
>> Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
>> Please reply to the newsgroup
 

bc4

Distinguished
Apr 20, 2004
772
0
18,990
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

In news:1123291797.761879.256370@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
BC <callmebc@gmail.com> typed:

> Well, actually....
>
> Registry cleaners do work


Yes, they often do.

However, the problems with them are two:

1. The things they clean generally don't need to be cleaned.
There's no real disadvantage to having unused registry entries.

2. They sometimes erroneously remove registry entries that are
needed.

That's why I say "They are not needed and are far more likely to
cause a problem than to solve one."



> and I've found JV16
> in particular to be extremely helpful for cleanups
> and removing annoying apps that won't uninstall
> properly.
> http://www.321download.com/LastFreeware
> http://www.jv16.org
>
> Just be sure to backup your registry beforehand


Absolutely. If you insist on using a registry cleaner, it's
foolhardy to use it without first backing up the registry.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup