Archived from groups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (
More info?)
"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d4b0252c1814ed2989a2c@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> In article <hpaEe.13219$t43.8573@tornado.tampabay.rr.com>,
> tomtoo@softhome.net says...
>>
>> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.1d4ac139b3c44ea3989a25@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
>> > In article <hPZDe.12266$t43.9222@tornado.tampabay.rr.com>,
>> <snip>
>> > I have a bunch ASUS motherboard based system with 512MB PC2700 RAM,
>> > Celeron 2.54Ghz, and a video card that feels (to all users) to be about
>> > twice as fast with opening/closing, running Word and Excel, pulling
>> > data
>> > out of a dedicated SQL application, and even browsing the web. The
>> > difference is the chipset and base speeds of the parts.
>> >
>> > I fully expect the P4/533 and the PC2700 RAM to feel faster by leaps
>> > and
>> > bounds. The 2500 already had 512MB in it, but it was slow as heck. I
>> > have older Optiplex 100 systems with a Celeron 433 chip and 256MB of
>> > ram, with XP Prof that perform just as fast as the base 2400.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> "feels" faster? Why don't you run a benchmark. I'd bet "feels" is under
>> 10%.
>
> In side by side testing, the loading of any application for the first
> instance is about 8 seconds difference for things like Word, Excel,
> FrameWorks, Outlook.
>
> For things like running a simple customer update inside an application,
> one that hits a strong SQL server, the process takes 4 second on the
> 2400 and under 1 second on the ASUS 2.54ghz machine. When scrolling
> between customer records the Dell 2400 updates each screen in about 3
> seconds and the ASUS as fast as they can push they NEXT button.
>
> Installation of the software, the medical package, took over 28 minutes
> on the 2400 systems, and under 8 minutes on the ASUS motherboard
> machines, under 5 on a Centrono 2ghz laptop and about 5 minutes on a
> P4/3.2ghz HT enabled system.
>
> The difference between the ASUS machine and the Dell 2400 was a follows:
>
> Dell 2.4ghz, 512MB RAM, 40GB IDE drive, onboard video.
>
> ASUS 2.5ghz (533), 512MB RAM (PC2700), 40GB IDE (7200RPM), real video
> card.
>
> How is that for real numbers.
>
> --
>
> spam999free@rrohio.com
> remove 999 in order to email me
Good information. Certainly lots of variables, of course. I made sure my
2400 had a 7200rpm drive, which makes a huge difference. Mine is a 2.8/533
with PC2700, so it likely performs closer to your ASUS machine (or better).
It certainly is faster than my 4550 with the p4-2.66. I'm not a fan of the
Celeron 2400 models, but the 'real' P4 machines are a good value.
Tom