Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (
More info?)
No Stupider, I answered and responded and gave the OP more than that.
Permission is a question I asked the OP, not granted by me, that would be
ironic. If the OP intended to follow the "agreement" that wasn't flawed, the
OP wouldn't be posting here. Anyway Stupider, thanks for dropping by, I'd
like to say it was a pleasure, but I'm not a hypocrite. Do come again.
- Winux P
"Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message
news:eO8Re94mFHA.3960@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> The OP was not asking permission.
> If "permission" is all the OP wanted, that is now received from you.
> However if the OP intends to follow the agreement he has agreed, the
> answer may be different.
> Many people value their word and intend to keep their agreements.
>
> --
> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
>
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
>
http://www.dts-l.org
>
>
> "Winux P" <winuxp@msnews.grp> wrote in message
> news:%23V5Ygj1mFHA.2444@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> - No, no need to burden yourself, you can still be a good citizen. You're
>> not a criminal (of any sort) in this context unless you're convicted in a
>> court of law. Except MS law of guilt before innocence, which is yet to be
>> executed.
>>
>> ...is it legal?
>>
>> - It's not illegal, there are more loop holes in EULA than holes in
>> Windows security. A little common sense on your behalf can get you both
>> computers activated, and successful WGA execution. After all it the so
>> called 'honest' XP users having problems with WGA.
>>
>> As you've stated you have a genuine copy of Windows XP. It's yours. Why
>> are you here to seek permission anyway???
>>
>> Kurayami-san, EULA wa usotsuki desu ne, shinpanai yo, gambatte ne!
>>
>> - Winux P
>
>