<A HREF="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=8313" target="_new">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=8313</A>
Obviously this PC was not configured to run the A64 at it's full potential, but this is the second benchmark I have seen posted that shows really bad performance. My question is why is AMD setting themselves up in this way. Why are they demonstrating CPU's of such low performance that obviously should not be seen by the public. And to have a known benchmark installed on the system they are displaying; very disappointing.
Other 3D Mark benches. <A HREF="http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/cpu_charts-23.html" target="_new">http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/cpu_charts-23.html</A>
Listen to me now and forget me tomorrow
Obviously this PC was not configured to run the A64 at it's full potential, but this is the second benchmark I have seen posted that shows really bad performance. My question is why is AMD setting themselves up in this way. Why are they demonstrating CPU's of such low performance that obviously should not be seen by the public. And to have a known benchmark installed on the system they are displaying; very disappointing.
Other 3D Mark benches. <A HREF="http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/cpu_charts-23.html" target="_new">http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/cpu_charts-23.html</A>
Listen to me now and forget me tomorrow