Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (More info?)
I bought a barebones Dell server (with 2.8G Hyperthreaded CPU) and am
thinking of adding a RAID 1 using 2 IDE drives.
I am wondering what advantage is there of using the SATA drives. Also is
the installation of these drives much different from regular IDE raid? I was
thinking of using the Adaptec 1210SA.
Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (More info?)
400SC supports SATA right off the system board though the cables are much
narrower...about 1/3" wide....so make sure you get them with the drive.
The install is the same as a standard IDE drive...the BIOS will see the SATA
drive on boot.
Advantage? SPEED! MUCH FASTER than standard IDE drives.
"somebody" <vkumarsomeone@sonic.net> wrote in message
newsb3fc.5575$Fo4.68152@typhoon.sonic.net...
> I bought a barebones Dell server (with 2.8G Hyperthreaded CPU) and am
> thinking of adding a RAID 1 using 2 IDE drives.
> I am wondering what advantage is there of using the SATA drives. Also is
> the installation of these drives much different from regular IDE raid? I
was
> thinking of using the Adaptec 1210SA.
>
> Appreciate comments and suggestions.
>
>
Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (More info?)
"Patrick" <pearcepd@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:SYvfc.62287$QQ6.29298@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> 400SC supports SATA right off the system board though the cables are much
> narrower...about 1/3" wide....so make sure you get them with the drive.
>
> The install is the same as a standard IDE drive...the BIOS will see the
SATA
> drive on boot.
>
> Advantage? SPEED! MUCH FASTER than standard IDE drives.
>
>
>
> "somebody" <vkumarsomeone@sonic.net> wrote in message
> newsb3fc.5575$Fo4.68152@typhoon.sonic.net...
> > I bought a barebones Dell server (with 2.8G Hyperthreaded CPU) and am
> > thinking of adding a RAID 1 using 2 IDE drives.
> > I am wondering what advantage is there of using the SATA drives. Also
is
> > the installation of these drives much different from regular IDE raid? I
> was
> > thinking of using the Adaptec 1210SA.
> >
> > Appreciate comments and suggestions.
> >
> >
But the RAID will still need a seperate card right?
Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (More info?)
"somebody" <vkumarsomeone@sonic.net> wrote...
>
> But the RAID will still need a seperate card right?
Not in many/most cases.
Many current motherboards have on-board RAID 0 and RAID 1 capability without
add-on cards. Most are limited to 2 SATA drives for RAID 0/1, though. Adding
another pair or going to RAID 5 will usually require another card.
Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (More info?)
"John R Weiss" <jrweiss98155@.comNOSPAMcast.net> wrote in message
news:WMFfc.46343$xn4.190560@attbi_s51...
> "somebody" <vkumarsomeone@sonic.net> wrote...
> >
> > But the RAID will still need a seperate card right?
>
> Not in many/most cases.
>
> Many current motherboards have on-board RAID 0 and RAID 1 capability
without
> add-on cards. Most are limited to 2 SATA drives for RAID 0/1, though.
Adding
> another pair or going to RAID 5 will usually require another card.
>
So can I configure for Raid 1 on the Dell 400SC without buying and add on
card? Does the m/b have RAID built in?
Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (More info?)
The main difference with setting up SATA is that you get 1 drive per SATA channel, there is no master slave.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
"somebody" <vkumarsomeone@sonic.net> wrote in message newsb3fc.5575$Fo4.68152@typhoon.sonic.net...
> I bought a barebones Dell server (with 2.8G Hyperthreaded CPU) and am
> thinking of adding a RAID 1 using 2 IDE drives.
> I am wondering what advantage is there of using the SATA drives. Also is
> the installation of these drives much different from regular IDE raid? I was
> thinking of using the Adaptec 1210SA.
>
> Appreciate comments and suggestions.
>
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.