How much does CPU affect gaming performance?

Get a 2400xp, the epox 8rda board and a good hsf cooler, with ddr333 memory you will be able to choose what multiplier to use and run the fsb upto 166mhz (333ddr). I dont know if you like overclocking or ever tried it but its so simple with this motherboard, the 2400 will hit 2.25ghz easily on maybe 140mhz fsb and 16 multipier performing about the same as a 2700.Or up the voltage to maybe 1.75 volts and run the memory at 146 fsb on 16 multi (2.33ghz) or 155 on 15 (probably best to tweak and test yourself) and achieve a 3000 and over rating while saving a couple hundred $$$$$

How much does the CPU affect performance?

The truth?

With comperable AMD and Intel CPUs and decent combination of memory, video and drives...Not enough that you'd notice it unless you put the two machines side by side. And even then it would most likely show up only under test conditions with one machine winning some comparisons and the other winning others.

This is a highly competative market where big decisions are made by splitting hairs all the time... But what you can trust and what you can afford... then just relax and enjoy it. There really is no bonus in sweating the small stuff.


--->It ain't better if it don't work<---

i believe Teq is referring to the Intel vs. AMD choice

as to the difference that the speeds make? <A HREF="http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/cpu_charts-23..." target="_new">check out these benchmarks</A>
(click next, as well, because that only links to 3Dmark01 benches, there are ut2k3 benches as well

however, i should add that cpu utilization depends on the game. comanche 4 is almost nothing but CPU dependent, same with Jedi Knight II, while Aquanox is highly optimized for graphics cards. most games fall somewhere in the middle, like 50/50. this makes me mad though, because i'd rather just upgrade my video card instaed of my whole system every year or so! > 

<A HREF="http://www.tweaktown.com/document.php?dType=guide&dId=1..." target="_new">WinXP tweak guide</A>
<A HREF="http://www.tweaktown.com/document.php?dType=guide&dId=1..." target="_new">WinXP tweak guide 2</A>

With dx9 though, the main piece of hardware will be the gfx card, i mean look at 3dm03, a few ppl with 1gig durons got 4000+ at stock speeds (rad 9700pro at 324.310) compared to a 2700xp scoring between 4600 and 4800. If the games perform like this then it will mean we will only need to upgrade our gfx cards .....

Yeah, it depends on the game. If it's a big game with lots of AI (sprites) or environmental effects, then your processor would shoulder the burden (think of games like Command and Conquer or Battlefield 1942 where there is lots of AI).

If it's just a FPS, it's mostly graphics card, since most of the environmentals are handled by the video card (such as shading and mapping and the like).

I'd say, considering the small difference between a 2.4 and a 2.6, get the 2.4 and spend the extra on a nice heatsink and overclock. You'll be able to keep the heatsink and use it on future processors, while you won't be able to use the cpu once it's obsolete.

XP 2500+ Barton @ 2241Mhz
A7N8X Dlx
2x512MB Corsair PC3200
MSI GF3Ti 500
16x DVD-ROM
2x80GB 7200RPM Maxtor
Onboard audio

Can you wait till Canterwood comes out for Intel in the next ten days? You can OC 2.4b to 3.5 Gig. You will not lose that much between 2.4b 2.53.

You could easily do with a 1.8A GHz P4 CPU or an Athlon 1700+ TbredB OCed or a 2100+ TbredB. The Sims (ACK <I SPIT TO RID MOUTH OF WORD>) is evil.

eBay, kick ass!

My 3DMark2001 Score: <A HREF="http://link" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6258104&lt;/A>
-
I bought from Best Buy once. Once.