Unreal Tournament 2003 benchmarks on the Opteron!!

[Dedonder12]

I have seen the test of Anandtech, but those tests were completely limited by the PCI bus, as the Athlon 3000+ was performing like a Athlon 2200+, which is impossible of course.

Ace's has done some UT2003 benches, but has used the null render. This is like running a normal benchmark, only the videocard part doesn't happen.
<A HREF="http://www.aceshardware.com/#65000413" target="_new">http://www.aceshardware.com/#65000413</A>

The Opteron 1.8 GHz performed like a 2.8 GHz P4, which isn't bad at all. But IMHO, the Athlon 64 will need at least 2.2 GHz to compete with the 3.4 GHz Pentium 4 which will be available when the Athlon 64 is launched.

 

[juin]

This wont show real perf can give you a figure at best.Xbit lab got benchmark of game with a AGP controleur A64 is as fast as any P4 right now that the rest of workload that fall behind badly due to low clock speed.

[-peep-] french

 

[eden]

If we look at Opteron 1.8GHZ's performance against a 3GHZ HT, raise by 400MHZ, remove about 15% of performance, we still have a damn good performer. And god knows what optimizations nVidia could do to the nForce 3.

--
This post is brought to you by Eden, on a Via Eden, in the garden of Eden.