I have seen the test of Anandtech, but those tests were completely limited by the PCI bus, as the Athlon 3000+ was performing like a Athlon 2200+, which is impossible of course.
Ace's has done some UT2003 benches, but has used the null render. This is like running a normal benchmark, only the videocard part doesn't happen.
<A HREF="http://www.aceshardware.com/#65000413" target="_new">http://www.aceshardware.com/#65000413</A>
The Opteron 1.8 GHz performed like a 2.8 GHz P4, which isn't bad at all. But IMHO, the Athlon 64 will need at least 2.2 GHz to compete with the 3.4 GHz Pentium 4 which will be available when the Athlon 64 is launched.
This wont show real perf can give you a figure at best.Xbit lab got benchmark of game with a AGP controleur A64 is as fast as any P4 right now that the rest of workload that fall behind badly due to low clock speed.
If we look at Opteron 1.8GHZ's performance against a 3GHZ HT, raise by 400MHZ, remove about 15% of performance, we still have a damn good performer. And god knows what optimizations nVidia could do to the nForce 3.
--
This post is brought to you by Eden, on a Via Eden, in the garden of Eden.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.