Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (
More info?)
In article <1124267479.20883.0@sabbath.news.uk.clara.net>, brianc@
127.0.0.1.activesol.co.uk says...
> Where I work I am happy to allow users VPN access provided I have checked
> their laptops first to check their firewall and anti-virus arrangements (we
> control anti-virus centrally). If you are very security conscious then you
> can configure firewall settings for the vpn connection at the server end,
> thereby reducing any risk to the network. (Something for me to do!)
>
> I experienced (and had complaints about) a noticeable drop in performance
> surfing the net when we did it across the vpn connection. (Only those with
> broadband noticed a drop, those with dial up didn't seem to notice.) Latency
> aside, bandwidth is logically the smaller of your local download speed and
> the upload speed on the company network. We have broadband at work, so high
> download but much lower upload - our upload (288kbps) is lower than most
> people have as their download speed (on broadband), hence the noticeable
> drop in performance. If we had a faster link at work then (other than
> latency) it would unlikely to be noticeable. (I don't have figures to prove
> it, but I'm sure its latency people notice more than bandwidth, but I could
> be wrong.)
>
> I accept all of your points - and I think any reader should seriously
> consider them, but I'm happy for us to run as we are, allowing people local
> access to the internet.
We're cool, I just wanted you to be aware of the implications and I
wasn't sure that you were when I posted.
--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me