Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Dual Athlons or Single?
Word :    Username :           
 

For $500-$700, I want to upgrade my PC. Currently it's a 1.2GHz Athlon. I do lots of DiVX encoding, not video rendering, and it gets along at 12fps full-resolution just fine, but that's really quite slow.

For this money (in about August or so...), I could get a top model Athlon XP or two mid-level XPs and run in dual. Right now, it would be between dual 2400+ or 2500+ and a single 3000+ or 3200+.

I think the duals would be better, yes?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

There are pros and cons really. I recently put together a dual Athlon system but using MPs which will cost twice as much as modded XPs. But I hear people have modded XPs and it works fine. So the first con is you have to mod your hardware. Second con would probably be you have to use a relatively old chipset although that also doesn't matter too much because it's stable and still pretty fast. You can put DDR333 memory in it and turn the FSB up to 150 or so but of course, no fancy dual-channel or anything. The big Pro of course is the great stability and multithreading ability of a dual system. If you still want to use your computer for other CPU intensive stuff whilst encoding DiVX at maximum speed then a dual system is for you.

<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/myanandtech.html?member=114979" target="_new">My PCs</A> :cool:

Reply to sjonnie
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Dual Athlons or Single?
Go to:

There are 1355 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them