What an odd thing to say. Everyone and their uncle (including tom’s hardware) said that 3.2 is it. I suggest a little bit of research prior to asking questions or answering them.
I know everyone seems to be constantly referring to Prescott as Pentium 5, but last I checked they are planning to use the Pentium 4 name at least through the Tejas core. Things may have changed without my knowledge though. (imagine that)
Think about this, when Intel first launched the Pentium 4, they stated the architecture was designed to scale to 10 GHz. Why would they change to P5 already? P4 was launched on the Willamette core but later changed to Northwood without changing the name. As I understand it, Intel changes the name when they introduce a major microarchitectual change, not for a core change. Correct me if I am wrong.
Well, last I heard the people at Intel's marketing were discussing names for the Prescott processor... Maybe it'll be Pentium 5, or maybe they'll just stick to P4. I have the impression that they'll stick with P4, though... let's see.
Actually, there was a thread around here in which we discussed those things <A HREF="http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=140157#140157" target="_new">ad <b>naus</b>ium.</A>
I believe the interview you are referring to about the Nehalem was not literal. His words were something like "they will probably call Pentium 8 or something". It makes no sense. Intel would have to skip over a number for that to work. ie Prescott=P5, Tejas=P6, Nehalem=P8
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.