Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)
Ever since I installed some software, I've been receiving this message "To
protect your computer, this application must be closed". The only way I can
get any program (Windows Explorer, Media Player, etc) to run is by having DEP
ignore it. Any ideas?
--
ricco
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)
What software was installed?
DEP prevents malicious code from executing from protected areas of memory.
Something you installed, or that piggy-backed its way in the installation,
is trying to run on your machine.
"ricco" <ricco@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news1F5CD06-D7E1-4156-877E-99207E102ABC@microsoft.com...
> Ever since I installed some software, I've been receiving this message "To
> protect your computer, this application must be closed". The only way I
> can
> get any program (Windows Explorer, Media Player, etc) to run is by having
> DEP
> ignore it. Any ideas?
> --
> ricco
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)
Rick-
I installed Pinnacle Studio 9 Plus. It's a video editing program. Thanks.
--
ricco
"Rick "Nutcase" Rogers" wrote:
> What software was installed?
>
> DEP prevents malicious code from executing from protected areas of memory.
> Something you installed, or that piggy-backed its way in the installation,
> is trying to run on your machine.
>
> --
> Best of Luck,
>
> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ > Associate Expert - WindowsXP Expert Zone
> www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone > Windows help - www.rickrogers.org >
> "ricco" <ricco@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news1F5CD06-D7E1-4156-877E-99207E102ABC@microsoft.com...
> > Ever since I installed some software, I've been receiving this message "To
> > protect your computer, this application must be closed". The only way I
> > can
> > get any program (Windows Explorer, Media Player, etc) to run is by having
> > DEP
> > ignore it. Any ideas?
> > --
> > ricco
>
>
>
"ricco" <ricco@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:24CFB0C0-05A3-4428-95B2-D403E2813672@microsoft.com...
> Rick-
> I installed Pinnacle Studio 9 Plus. It's a video editing program.
> Thanks.
> --
> ricco
>
>
> "Rick "Nutcase" Rogers" wrote:
>
>> What software was installed?
>>
>> DEP prevents malicious code from executing from protected areas of
>> memory.
>> Something you installed, or that piggy-backed its way in the
>> installation,
>> is trying to run on your machine.
>>
>> --
>> Best of Luck,
>>
>> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ >> Associate Expert - WindowsXP Expert Zone
>> www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone >> Windows help - www.rickrogers.org >>
>> "ricco" <ricco@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news1F5CD06-D7E1-4156-877E-99207E102ABC@microsoft.com...
>> > Ever since I installed some software, I've been receiving this message
>> > "To
>> > protect your computer, this application must be closed". The only way
>> > I
>> > can
>> > get any program (Windows Explorer, Media Player, etc) to run is by
>> > having
>> > DEP
>> > ignore it. Any ideas?
>> > --
>> > ricco
>>
>>
>>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)
I downloaded update version 9.4.3 from their website.
--
ricco
"Rick "Nutcase" Rogers" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have you tried contacting Pinnacle yet? There are several patches for vers.
> 9.
>
> --
> Best of Luck,
>
> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ > Associate Expert - WindowsXP Expert Zone
> www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone > Windows help - www.rickrogers.org >
> "ricco" <ricco@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:24CFB0C0-05A3-4428-95B2-D403E2813672@microsoft.com...
> > Rick-
> > I installed Pinnacle Studio 9 Plus. It's a video editing program.
> > Thanks.
> > --
> > ricco
> >
> >
> > "Rick "Nutcase" Rogers" wrote:
> >
> >> What software was installed?
> >>
> >> DEP prevents malicious code from executing from protected areas of
> >> memory.
> >> Something you installed, or that piggy-backed its way in the
> >> installation,
> >> is trying to run on your machine.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best of Luck,
> >>
> >> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ > >> Associate Expert - WindowsXP Expert Zone
> >> www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone > >> Windows help - www.rickrogers.org > >>
> >> "ricco" <ricco@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news1F5CD06-D7E1-4156-877E-99207E102ABC@microsoft.com...
> >> > Ever since I installed some software, I've been receiving this message
> >> > "To
> >> > protect your computer, this application must be closed". The only way
> >> > I
> >> > can
> >> > get any program (Windows Explorer, Media Player, etc) to run is by
> >> > having
> >> > DEP
> >> > ignore it. Any ideas?
> >> > --
> >> > ricco
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:57:03 -0400, "Rick \"Nutcase\" Rogers"
>What software was installed?
>DEP prevents malicious code from executing from protected areas of memory.
Not quite: DEP prevents code from executing from data areas of memory.
It has no inherent notion of "maliciousness".
>Something you installed, or that piggy-backed its way in the installation,
>is trying to run on your machine.
Or something is simply breaking the new rules that DEP applies. It's
poor programming practice to run code in memory allocated for data,
but it's only become a crashing offence post-DEP. Some programs do
this for no good reason, while others do this as the chosen way of
what it needs to do - av often falls into the latter category.
Google(SP2 DEP {NameOfSoftware} )
>------------ ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
The most accurate diagnostic instrument
in medicine is the Retrospectoscope
>------------ ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)
Ron Martell wrote:
> So not only do you complain incessantly about the vulnerability of
> Microsoft products to intrusions you also deliberately choose to
> disable one of the ways of protecting against these.
As has been pointed out, DEP doesn't differentiate between malicious,
and non-malicious executing from data areas of memory, so until it can &
does, I'll rely on my non-MS AV, ASW, & FW, to protect my virtual ass.
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:04:52 -0400, "kurttrail"
>Ron Martell wrote:
>> So not only do you complain incessantly about the vulnerability of
>> Microsoft products to intrusions you also deliberately choose to
>> disable one of the ways of protecting against these.
>As has been pointed out, DEP doesn't differentiate between malicious,
>and non-malicious executing from data areas of memory
At the level of abstraction it operates on, it can't be expected to.
Or... are you advocating "Trsuted Computing" at the hardware level?
>so until it can & does, I'll rely on my non-MS AV, ASW, & FW, to
>protect my virtual ass.
DEP is like PnP; it will be wobbly at first, but will grow into
something stronger, more reliable, and pretty well indispensible.
Unfortunately, there's no way to get to there from here without going
through the teething issues. It will be worth it though.
If you can DEP, then do - it will harden the PC so that a lot of raw
code exploits will bounce right off. Much like using Eudora for
email, with the "use MS Viewer" disabled, lets one just laugh at all
the OE/Outlook/IE exploit panics.
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)
cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user) wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:04:52 -0400, "kurttrail"
>> Ron Martell wrote:
>
>>> So not only do you complain incessantly about the vulnerability of
>>> Microsoft products to intrusions you also deliberately choose to
>>> disable one of the ways of protecting against these.
>
>> As has been pointed out, DEP doesn't differentiate between malicious,
>> and non-malicious executing from data areas of memory
>
> At the level of abstraction it operates on, it can't be expected to.
>
> Or... are you advocating "Trsuted Computing" at the hardware level?
LOL! No friggin' way! But that is its future.
>> so until it can & does, I'll rely on my non-MS AV, ASW, & FW, to
>> protect my virtual ass.
>
> DEP is like PnP; it will be wobbly at first, but will grow into
> something stronger, more reliable, and pretty well indispensible.
For now it is a PITA, and I'm pretty well protected without it.
> Unfortunately, there's no way to get to there from here without going
> through the teething issues. It will be worth it though.
I'll have moved to Linux long before it is a stable process.
> If you can DEP, then do - it will harden the PC so that a lot of raw
> code exploits will bounce right off. Much like using Eudora for
> email, with the "use MS Viewer" disabled, lets one just laugh at all
> the OE/Outlook/IE exploit panics.
Until we start hearing about the holes in its code. I really don't have
to worry about being affected by "raw code exploits" as don't go to
places where I find them.
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)
Hi Chris,
>>What software was installed?
>
>>DEP prevents malicious code from executing from protected areas of memory.
>
> Not quite: DEP prevents code from executing from data areas of memory.
> It has no inherent notion of "maliciousness".
I was over-simplifying in my explanation for the sake of expediency. My use
of the word 'malicious' was to convey a sense of foreboding, not to
qualify/categorize the type of software that executes from the data areas of
memory. DEP doesn't categorize, it simply prevents anything from executing.
>>Something you installed, or that piggy-backed its way in the installation,
>>is trying to run on your machine.
>
> Or something is simply breaking the new rules that DEP applies. It's
> poor programming practice to run code in memory allocated for data,
> but it's only become a crashing offence post-DEP. Some programs do
> this for no good reason, while others do this as the chosen way of
> what it needs to do - av often falls into the latter category.
This is likely the case, which is why I referred the OP to Pinnacle support.
There is a flaw somewhere in the program that is causing this.
>>------------ ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
> The most accurate diagnostic instrument
> in medicine is the Retrospectoscope
>>------------ ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.