OK, so you've seen a bunch of AMD fanatics claiming crap about compatability, <A HREF="http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherboard/20030519/i875p-02.html" target="_new">here's an article written <b>TWO MONTHS AGO</b></A> that shows what this is all about:
So what do we see at <A HREF="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboards/display/20030712011416.html" target="_new">X-Bit labs?</A>
So you see, you've all been fooled, but not by Intel, nor Asus. Instead you've been fooled by tabloid news that has been published not to inform you, but to scare you.
Who released the original story? Anandtech made a vague reference to an unnamed manufacturer who claimed this to be true. Perhaps this manufacturer was trying to delay your purchase until they could upgrade their own crappy boards? Or perhaps they were making more money off AMD products?
At any rate, I've held my tongue long enough, shame on you guys for repeating such garbage without investigating first. Shame on me for not looking up Tom's article sooner. I was kind of hoping some of you had read it, but I guess we don't read Tom's any more?
<font color=blue>Watts mean squat if you don't have quality!</font color=blue>
And the specification is even older than that! You see, Intel left it up to board manufacturers whether or not thy wanted to support the Prescott on their boards. Many have made claims that they have indeed provided their boards with the necessary hardware.Today, anyone entertaining the idea of getting a motherboard with the i875P chipset must ask themselves an important question: will the Northwood successor "Prescott" actually be supported by the board? It will, according to internal information from Intel papers, provided that an appropriate voltage regulator is used, in compliance with VRM specification 10.0. Add an adapted BIOS, and you should be good to go.
So what do we see at <A HREF="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboards/display/20030712011416.html" target="_new">X-Bit labs?</A>
So why DOES Asus claim their boards support the Prescott? Perhaps it's because they actually FOLLOWED VRM 10.0?In fact, mainboard makers have known that their current products do not support Prescott chips for weeks now, so, it is a mystery why, for example, ASUS still claims that their i865PE-based mainboard supports Prescott processor.
So you see, you've all been fooled, but not by Intel, nor Asus. Instead you've been fooled by tabloid news that has been published not to inform you, but to scare you.
Who released the original story? Anandtech made a vague reference to an unnamed manufacturer who claimed this to be true. Perhaps this manufacturer was trying to delay your purchase until they could upgrade their own crappy boards? Or perhaps they were making more money off AMD products?
At any rate, I've held my tongue long enough, shame on you guys for repeating such garbage without investigating first. Shame on me for not looking up Tom's article sooner. I was kind of hoping some of you had read it, but I guess we don't read Tom's any more?
<font color=blue>Watts mean squat if you don't have quality!</font color=blue>