Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Is it worth going from 1.7 to 2.0 gigahertz?

Is it worth going from 1.7 to 2.0 gigahertz?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - Is it worth going from 1.7 to 2.0 gigahertz?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I currently have a P4 1.7 gigahertz and according to what I've been told, my motherboard will support up to a 2.0 P4. Would this difference be noticeable, particularly in handling heavy graphics loads? I have a 128 meg ATI All in Wonder 9700 pro graphics card.
Appreciate any input.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

i think your motherboard could support cpus over 2g, by upgrading bios. wait for some time to get a cheaper price.

-[A.M.D]-

Reply to SunHeat

What motherboard is it? What do you actually do with the computer? and no, you probably wouldn't notice much difference, but your mobo may well support faster processors anyway.

---
$hit Happens. I just wish it would happen to someone else for a change.

Reply to ChipDeath
- 0 +

No...

Get your own sig!!! :tongue:

Reply to Grub

Don't know the mobo model #, but it's an Intel "Monteray" or something using a 423 pin 1.7 ghz cpu with an Intel 850 chipset.

Reply to jlwilliams1

Sounds to me like you're pretty screwed then for upgrade options. Besides, the 300MHz wouldn't really give you all <i>that</i> much more performance.

Another option though might be adding more RAM. How much do you have and what exactly do you do that you need more power for?

"<i>Let's see what <b>Paragraph 84-B</b> has to say about it.</i>" - Thief from <A HREF="http://www.nuklearpower.com/daily.php?date=030724" target="_new">8-Bit Theater</A>

Reply to slvr_phoenix
- 0 +

Agrees with slvr_phoenix:

If for example you are doing fairly graphics intensive stuff (games maybe :smile: ) your present graphics card/processor should be just great:
<A HREF="http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000242" target="_new">http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000242</A>
<A HREF="http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=361056#361056" target="_new">http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=361056#361056</A>

The loving are the daring!

Reply to Flinx

I just upgraded to 1 gig RAM, so I guess I'm pretty much topped out for this system.
Thanks for the input.

Reply to jlwilliams1

time to overclock :eek:

Did powerleap make a 423 to 470 converter?

3 386DX-25's...12 volts...glue some ln2 and a wicked amount of overclocking and you get a willamantee minus 36 pins, 33.75 million transistors and a couple hundred mhz... :cool:

Reply to pIII_Man

oh btw...you have only intel to thank for not having other cpu options...they did it to the celerons...they did it to the copermines...and they did it to the tualatins...

3 386DX-25's...12 volts...glue some ln2 and a wicked amount of overclocking and you get a willamantee minus 36 pins, 33.75 million transistors and a couple hundred mhz... :cool:

Reply to pIII_Man

Yes they did, but thats all that I know!! Anyway, the problem still sexists that his motherboard only officially supports 100FSB and its doubtful whether the i850 chipset can be overclocked to 133FSB. Nonetheless he could still get a 2.4Ghz 100FSB using the convertor.

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6752830" target="_new">Yay, I Finally broke the 12k barrier!!</A>

Reply to tombance

ewww 400mhz fsb on an intel cpu... I don't even think a 400mhz bus p4 2.4 will make a diffrence either...p4s luv bus speed...

3 386DX-25's...12 volts...glue some ln2 and a wicked amount of overclocking and you get a willamantee minus 36 pins, 33.75 million transistors and a couple hundred mhz... :cool:

Reply to pIII_Man
- 0 +

As Tombance said, with an adapter, you could use a 2.4 gig proc. This would be > 1/3 speed gain. With all the money you have tied up in ram, the adapter and 2.4 is your only upgrade option. My experience is that this would be a clearly noticable improvement.

Reply to endyen

it is not worth it...that cpu cannot reach its full potential cause it just has to slow of a bus...

3 386DX-25's...12 volts...glue some ln2 and a wicked amount of overclocking and you get a willamantee minus 36 pins, 33.75 million transistors and a couple hundred mhz... :cool:

Reply to pIII_Man
- 0 +

Here is the converter:
<A HREF="http://www.upgradeware.com/english/product/p478/p478.htm" target="_new">http://www.upgradeware.com/english/product/p478/p478.htm</A>
but check for the Mobo support

The loving are the daring!

Reply to Flinx
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Is it worth going from 1.7 to 2.0 gigahertz?
Go to:

There are 1157 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 16:28 bilbat won the Motherboards badge
  • 01:00 jayhsyn won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 nesta13 won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 petar won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 sinsear won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 UnawareAtol won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 buryaku won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 Redras0324 won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 dvdmania won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 ugotomega won the Uniformed badge