AMDzone has a review of a 246 opteron (1p 2ghz and 400fsb) vs 3.2ghz P4, opteron only has cas2.5 memory, P4 and athlon have cas2.
it is the most promising thing i have seen (from amds point of view) for ages, it really beats the p4, and if it had cas2 it would probably have won every benchmark, in terms of pricing a 146 will be similar to a p4 3.2ghz, but mobo and memory are more expensive.
anyway GO AND READ IT, suddenly a 2.4ghz Athlon 64 with cas2 and dual channel looks like it would be much more powerfull than any p4, plus according to inquirer A64s use same power as tbreds at same clock, which means opterons/A64s will have no power issues, and compared to prescotts will be cool runners.
Also, this is all on 32bit, 64bit is meant to have 10-15% more performance according to AMD!!!!!!
Also, in a thread at aces hardware, someone shows how opteron scales much better than p4, read that to.
it is the most promising thing i have seen (from amds point of view) for ages, it really beats the p4, and if it had cas2 it would probably have won every benchmark, in terms of pricing a 146 will be similar to a p4 3.2ghz, but mobo and memory are more expensive.
anyway GO AND READ IT, suddenly a 2.4ghz Athlon 64 with cas2 and dual channel looks like it would be much more powerfull than any p4, plus according to inquirer A64s use same power as tbreds at same clock, which means opterons/A64s will have no power issues, and compared to prescotts will be cool runners.
Also, this is all on 32bit, 64bit is meant to have 10-15% more performance according to AMD!!!!!!
Also, in a thread at aces hardware, someone shows how opteron scales much better than p4, read that to.