And there you've found the point of the article. What they really should do is have a Xeon video of how it's performance relates in doing multiple tasks. I use many different Xeon based machines as well as the latest p4's here at work, and for doing db work and coding, the Xeon has visibly faster results.
I would still buy a p4 3.2 if i had the chance, because it is running at the higher bus and is cheaper, but once the Xeon moves to 800, i think there will be a shift. This isn't canabilization or a lack of competition with AMD as the article seems to suggest. Intel seems to be waiting on the 800 Mhz FSB Xeon. They just upped the cache (hence the reason for the article), but the still are limiting the bus. I wonder how much heat a dual 3.2 Xeon system would create (and maybe that's an issue). *shrugs*
But i do think the article was a little off base. I've read a few other Xeon articles that actually kept the systems consistent and found them to be much more useful.
If the article's title was supposed to be an indication of the content, i say they should have used but 2 systems - dual system with old xeons, dual system with new, higher cache xeon. The way it is now is just confusing...
I'm just your average habitual smiler =D