1) I full realize that, but you were the one freaking out over why no one believes most of the things that came from the inquirer, and I quote:
> Honestly, I am getting a LOT of tired about this thing
> many of you have with the Inquirer. Whatever you see
> that you don't like you start saying "it's the Inquirer,
> it's all bullshit ...
I think I adaquetely explained why this occurs...
2) This is glaring example of being a fanboy...
> Whenever most of you here see something good
> about AMD, you have something bad to say. As
> I have already said, I am tired of this. It's
> not like I will bet my life that A64 will kick
> ass but I can't understand the obsession some
> have, to see AMD fail.
When you start attributing any naysaying about an item regardless of the source or reason behind it to intangible reasons such as "wanting to see amd fail" you are functioning as a fanboy or troll or both. Functionally is there a difference worth making a note of? No.
To continue along, as to not wanting to continue a discussion with a guy of "your low-level" (whatever that is) is prefectly fine, because I frankly don't expect you to come up with any intelligent form of response and without that there is no reason to debate with a fanboy.
As far as the performance of the opteron/a64... neither of my posts were even related to them... they were related to journalistic integrity and the reliability of a given source, a point you seem to be attempting to skirt around to make this something it's not (yet another great trait of the fanboy, inability to have a meaningful conversation about anything but what they are obsessed with.)
Have a nice day bumpkin!
*lick*
Shadus