Athlon 64 3200+ benchmarks!

eden

Champion
Heheh, the people seemed so gullible it's not even funny.

2.15GHZ you say? 50MHZ shy of the real target.

Keep dreamin'!

--
<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/album.html" target="_new"><font color=blue><b>Are you ugly and looking into showing your mug? Then the THGC Album is the right place for you!</b></font color=blue></A>
 

jmecor

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2003
2,332
0
19,780
that's really a high 3dmark score.
24000. Well, if it would have come from a much known/reliable hardware site. I might BELEIVE IT.
As of today i need more info.
 

Schmide

Distinguished
Aug 2, 2001
1,442
0
19,280
El Clickos

<A HREF="http://www.tbreak.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=19317" target="_new">http://www.tbreak.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=19317</A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6972333" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6972333</A>
<A HREF="http://discuss.futuremark.com/forum/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=techmobocpu&Number=2752953&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart=1" target="_new">http://discuss.futuremark.com/forum/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=techmobocpu&Number=2752953&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart=1</A>


Dichromatic for your viewing plesure...
 

phial

Splendid
Oct 29, 2002
6,757
0
25,780
legoman stfu


they were only being wary. lately theres been alot of spam here, and whos going to believe right off the bat someoene whos barely even posted here, yourself included

-------

<A HREF="http://www.teenirc.net/chat/tomshardware.html" target="_new"> come to THGC chat~ NOW. dont make me get up ffs @#@$</A>
 

spud

Distinguished
Feb 17, 2001
3,406
0
20,780
So why cant we see the GPU and its speed. Plus we all know CPU ID can be changed via a very creative useage of photoshop.

-Jeremy

:evil: <A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5341387" target="_new">Busting Sh@t Up!!!</A> :evil:
:evil: <A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm=1400777" target="_new">Busting More Sh@t Up!!!</A> :evil: <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by spud on 09/08/03 01:45 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
 

lhgpoobaa

Illustrious
Dec 31, 2007
14,462
1
40,780
LOL and everyone knows how much you can cheat at 3dmark.

<b><i>Consumers have spoken. They are tired of
paying the high cost of CDs & DVDs and prefer
more flexible forms of on-demand media
delivery."</i>
Regards,
Mr no integrity coward.</b>
 

jmecor

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2003
2,332
0
19,780
i wonder if a 2.4ghz a64 can get 30k in 3dmark without cheating.

<font color=green>If your nose <b>RUNS</b>, and feet <b>SMELLS</b>.
Then you must be born <b>UP-SIDE DOWN</b>.</font color=green>
 

SJJM

Distinguished
Aug 7, 2003
228
0
18,680
Your post does not even add up. The guy says he was using a MSI KT800. In 3d mark it shows that it was using a ms-6207 which I can not fine on ms web site.

<font color=blue>"You know, that my backstab attack does double the damage. I can make an off button for him." </font color=blue> :cool:
 
G

Guest

Guest
>Right 24k, funny how every other test from legitimate sites
>were 5-7 thousand points off his score

How many "legimite" test of an Athlon 64 have you seen ? None. BTW, these scores where submitted to futuremark, you can browse their results through the ORB. They are valid, and pretty damn impressive.

= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =
 

hatimh

Distinguished
Mar 23, 2001
407
0
18,780
Does the latest version or any version of CPU-Z have the logo for Athlon 64 built in?

-----------------------------------
The bigger I am, the harder they fall.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Yes.. look here :http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php#support

1.19a
08/13/2003
Start time has been greatly improved.
CPU, FSB, memory frequencies are periodically refreshed.
New Athlon64 and Opteron logos.

= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =
 

jmecor

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2003
2,332
0
19,780
yes, as what youve just seen.

<font color=green>If your nose <b>RUNS</b>, and feet <b>SMELLS</b>.
Then you must be born <b>UP-SIDE DOWN</b>.</font color=green>
 

ChipDeath

Splendid
May 16, 2002
4,307
0
22,790
i wonder if a 2.4ghz a64 can get 30k in 3dmark without cheating.
Even if we accept this particular score as valid, I can't see a small processor speed increase getting 6000 3dMarks... That's only gonna happen with a Vid card Upgrade in 3dMark, it's just too much a graphics benchie.

Besides, I though the first A64 was gonna be a 3400+? How could they release a chip with the same rating as an existing one, but which is faster? That would not be good for the ol' PR (if they can do any worse already)..

So what exactly is this chip, as it's <i>not</i> an A643200+? (unless the A64 will be released on a 215Mhz bus, which strikes me as a little unlikely..)

---
The end is nigh.. (For this post at least) :smile:
 

speeduk

Distinguished
Feb 20, 2003
1,476
0
19,280
Dont forget that when you overclock these A64 chips, they respond a lot better than a normal athlon xp. The onboard memory controller means that just a minor increase in the FSB can give noticeable increase in performance. That first score was an overclocked A64, but he also did a stock cpu/gpu bench and got 20,000. That in itself is impressive.

For me, thats not too hard to accept. What weve seen so far has mainly been Opteron benches on Opteron boards. A few months down the line and one of the first guys to put a 3200 A64 through its paces reveals its not a bad performer at all. And when overclocked, it yields excellent results.

I hang around that forum quite a bit and I think I'll be there a lot more from now on!

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6936722" target="_new"> My rig </A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1150155" target="_new"> 3D-03 </A>
<font color=red> 120% overclocker </font color=red> (cheapskate)
 

ChipDeath

Splendid
May 16, 2002
4,307
0
22,790
so merely increasing FSB by 7.5% yields an Extra 20% in 3dMArk? I still find that a bit hard to believe...

Though if it responds to Ocing that well, I'm gonna get me one and some watercooling *grins*

---
The end is nigh.. (For this post at least) :smile:
 

mcbunker

Distinguished
Sep 8, 2003
4
0
18,510
I am the administrator on the tbreak forums (Hybrid). I can confirm that the benchmarks are 110% real. The CPU has now been handed back to our main tester for normal benchmarks. The overclocking gang on the forums should be getting it back again later today for even more overclocking madness. The haven't even put the prometia cooling system on yet, as the CPU only reaches 39 degrees max on air cooling.

Expect more benchmarks later.

There is no need to doubt the results, they are real.
 

jmecor

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2003
2,332
0
19,780
but what graphics processor does it use?

<font color=green>If your nose <b>RUNS</b>, and feet <b>SMELLS</b>.
Then you must be born <b>UP-SIDE DOWN</b>.</font color=green>
 
G

Guest

Guest
>"Besides, I though the first A64 was gonna be a 3400+? "

All rumours seem to point to a 2 GHZ 3200+ and a 2.2 GHz 3400+ release in a few weeks, and then off course the 2.2 GHz Athlon FX (=Opteron) chip, without PR rating.

>"How could they release a chip with the same rating as an >existing one, but which is faster? "

'64' will make the difference. also, don't expect all applicatons to run faster on a athlon 64 3200+ than a Barton 3200+. It has a lower clock, and this will impact some apps.

>"That would not be good for the ol' PR (if they can do any >worse already).."

Yeah, whats gonna be worse, is the the super expensive Athlon FX with its dual channel MC, may well be outperformed by the cheaper Athlon64 in quite a few tests. The reason ? Unbuffered memory. To give just one example, I will eat my hat if the FX 2.2 GHz outperforms the A64 2.2 GHz in Quake3. you may quote me to this in a few weeks.

So what exactly is this chip, as it's not an A643200+?

Its an overclocked 3200+ 2 GHz Athlon 64

= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =
 

SJJM

Distinguished
Aug 7, 2003
228
0
18,680
No one has address me about the mb. Why does it say a mb is not made. The kt800 is 9#### something and it is saying 6207. If it reads the info right off the mb itself should it not have the correct id number.

<font color=blue>"You know, that my backstab attack does double the damage. I can make an off button for him." </font color=blue> :cool:
 

spud

Distinguished
Feb 17, 2001
3,406
0
20,780
Its a fake so who cares... Fagboy fanboys at it again...

-Jeremy



:evil: <A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5341387" target="_new">Busting Sh@t Up!!!</A> :evil:
:evil: <A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm=1400777" target="_new">Busting More Sh@t Up!!!</A> :evil:
 

TRENDING THREADS